Viewing profile — Manjuuu
Manjuuu
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 04, 2014, 12:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 232
- Public activity
- 140 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Manjuuu
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37383989
Another model that we'll soon forget it ever existed.
-
comment
Comment #36958556
Thanks for the detailed answer. > For example, you could write `jj merge @ main` to make a merge commit with the working copy[1] and the `main` branch. Since it's my first time see…
-
comment
Comment #36957810
> You would expect the push to fail in the normal way, as if you had manually done the rebase, because your commit history may have diverged. That being said, I don't think this ha…
-
comment
Comment #36955927
I've just started looking into this, and since this seems to be doing a few automatic rebases under the hood, I wonder how this behave if commits get randomly pushed to origin. For…
- story
-
comment
Comment #36797800
Yep, REST make no sense between microservices, for what are basically RPCs.
-
comment
Comment #36298656
I didn't say non-academic, I explicitly said "crazy people". The lab theory will be taken seriously when there will be serious evidences. If they exist they will come out. Believin…
-
comment
Comment #36298453
Man, you are talking about yourself, you literally started this subthread with the basic set of round of the mill covid contrarians BS that have 0 ground in reality and survive onl…
-
comment
Comment #36296368
A lot of people were extremely confused during the pandemic and that's why they couldn't differentiate between actual verifiable information being shared and some random newscaster…
-
comment
Comment #36296292
Actually I was not sure which kind of masks you meant so I pointed out that real masks worked, but yes, obviously cotton/silk/lines/whatever masks without any kind of filter are us…
-
comment
Comment #36296157
Nope, I don't plan to watch anything, feel free to indulge in your beliefs.
-
comment
Comment #36295664
Plenty? Which kind of arguments? The ones you can hear only in podcasts for crazy people with unknown sources? We can be better than this... cmon.
-
comment
Comment #36295610
They are just too enamored with their opinions, you are ok, let them make a fool of themselves.
-
comment
Comment #36295526
> The NHS now has chronic shortage of nurses. Why? Because it's not an attractive profession nowadays. Not for the few hundreds of deniers that were fired. > You're rather proving …
-
comment
Comment #36295439
> as having a 95% effectiveness against transmission for the original strain. 95% reduction of serious illness. The objective of the mass vaccination was having as much people as p…
-
comment
Comment #36295366
Yeah, the handling was not great but sadly I'm not really sure if the population was ready for detailed debate, considering that a good chunk of it ended up misunderstanding most o…
-
comment
Comment #36295012
I don't forget anything. As I can't forget all the times that I had to explain, since the beginning, that the only statistics available where about reducing to 0 the risk of seriou…
-
comment
Comment #36294833
Only the one that resembled a textbook conspiracy, the first one had some evidence and is still considered part of where the issue started.
-
comment
Comment #36292959
No, that right there is how I remind you that if you want your hypothesis to be taken seriously you need proofs or at least a very compelling argument. There was neither.
-
comment
Comment #36292934
When there were zero evidences? Yeah, go figure.
-
comment
Comment #36292916
Yep. Top notch research.
-
comment
Comment #36292909
I'm hoping that in a decade or so, people will stop using "vaccines never prevented transmission" as an argument since it has been said at least a billion of times since the beginn…
-
comment
Comment #36292784
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #36292757
There has never been any strong consensus (including medical) against, quite the opposite. That's why the lockdowns were done in the first place. Don't try to turn your personal be…
-
comment
Comment #36256717
> that he can prevent other people from discussing something And again, when some rando says "they want to prevent people from discussing, free speech!" the topic is always the sam…