Viewing profile — Loquebantur
Loquebantur
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Oct 22, 2022, 8:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 638
- Public activity
- 244 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Loquebantur
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225619
So? "Housecleaning" isn't part of USCYBERCOM, obviously, it belongs to several arms of the (military) IC and is even partly sourced out to private contractors. Obviously, it's not …
-
comment
Comment #49225491
You might want to actually read the article, then you would see how your descriptions don't actually apply. Part of the shitty work conditions (that remarkably persist despite incr…
-
comment
Comment #49225390
Yet you fail completely at rationally arguing your "thoughts".
-
comment
Comment #49225254
The US intelligence community engaging in murdering suspected "weak links" in order to "send a message", "clean the house" etc. is a regularly recurring phenomenon. The fiction, th…
-
comment
Comment #49225162
You supplant your lack of knowledge in statistics with unfounded assumptions and overt bias. The relevant metric here is number of deaths per size of the specified group and per ti…
-
comment
Comment #49224163
https://archive.ph/W2tpE > One of the dead was Technical Sergeant Kevin Stallings, a digital network intelligence analyst whose family told Bloomberg they wanted him to be identifi…
-
comment
Comment #49221866
Probably, more importantly: it's a lie.
-
comment
Comment #49221859
That's gross disinformation and patently untrue.
-
comment
Comment #49221845
It's a systemic issue, not due to one man. What gets overlooked here is the US IC itself being a probable cause: the habit of "housecleaning" by killing individuals suspected to be…
-
comment
Comment #49221775
What gets overlooked here is the US IC itself being a probable cause: the habit of "housecleaning" by killing individuals suspected to be possible (even only prospective) leaks of …
-
comment
Comment #49092577
You're right about that, but that's a corner too much to turn for most people.
-
comment
Comment #49092507
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #49090845
? That's total nonsense. Positions of power attract people who want to use that power for their own gain. They abuse it regularly, whether it's politics, enterprises or even charit…
-
comment
Comment #49084275
The public narrative around conspiracy theories is baffling for sure: what rational basis is there for assuming them wrong? Often none. Incentive and ability are what should be loo…
-
comment
Comment #49075228
That propaganda trick isn't "one guy repeats stuff a thousand times" and works on a substantial subset of the population. Human society isn't restricted to "focusing on one thing o…
-
comment
Comment #49069157
You're conceptually wrong about "the theory" and factually about the majority of fires. The fundamental connection increase of CO2 => increase in mean temperature => increase in fr…
-
comment
Comment #49068875
You're very wrong. The propaganda practice of incessant repetition being effective even in face of blatantly obvious contradicting facts is well established. The reason climate cat…
-
comment
Comment #49068836
Well, actually, you're exemplifying mine. Being trapped in an Overton window selected for you by those invested in upholding the status quo is what leads to your emotional stress. …
-
comment
Comment #49068773
There is no dichotomy between preparing for the inevitable and preventing the preventable. Painting the actions of people on the other side of the planet as "out of anybody's contr…
-
comment
Comment #49068655
What is indicative of escalating climate catastrophe is indeed the intensity and frequency of those firestorms, not any lack of precedent for a cloud shape. But the really salient …
-
comment
Comment #49068503
A rational approach to existential threats is indeed good advice, but to surrender in the face of complexity is not. The human induced climate catastrophe is due to a systemic fail…
-
comment
Comment #49068376
The human induced climate catastrophe has reached unprecedented levels because of humanity's continued failure to correctly integrate that reality into their decisions and the resu…
-
comment
Comment #48891927
People in the climate movement are rarely professional PR folks. Weaponizing their personal faults against the objective subject matter they talk about is disingenuous anyway? You …
-
comment
Comment #48891859
It maybe would, if people were to read it in the first place. But they don't: they go to the comments here first and try to get the gist of reactions, in order to save themselves t…
-
comment
Comment #48891817
Only, while such work is necessary it's also insufficient . You point at the actual problem yourself: political obstruction and funding going to the opposite. The relevant issues h…