Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Lockerman

Lockerman

HN member
Joined
Thu, Oct 31, 2019, 11:00 PM UTC
HN karma
17
Public activity
7 items

About Lockerman

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #28935459

    Timescale engineer here The initial drive for this was some of the work we did on Promscale, along with some observations I made when experimenting with potential optimizations for…

  2. comment
    Comment #28922454

    Not yet, right now all datapoints must be known at the during the sort

  3. comment
    Comment #28920229

    > Oh or I see timevector returns a custom datatype, so I suppose the answer is it has to be one of a fixed number of provided types? Exactly! These aren't general arithmetic operat…

  4. comment
    Comment #28920159

    (Timescale engineer here) To summarize a bit on what David said here[1]: there are no modifications to the query engine, this is all using Postgres's custom operator support. https…

  5. comment
    Comment #28528142

    a separate implementation

  6. comment
    Comment #23920605

    Timescale engineer here. I'm betting we'll see a nice win; we tend to see write-mostly workloads the UNDO shouldn't be too expensive, and the smaller tuple sizes should be nice. We…

  7. comment
    Comment #21874904

    Hi, Timescale engineer here, do you happen to remember around when/in what version you ran into this bug?