Viewing profile — Lionsion
Lionsion
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 12, 2018, 8:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,164
- Public activity
- 268 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Lionsion
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17115200
> Your comment history is extremely problematic for Hacker News, because you've been using it to engage in nationalistic flamewar. I don't care what your views are or which nations…
-
comment
Comment #17115178
Sorry. I did not think I was engaging in any personal attacks or "nationalistic flame-war," rather just responding to someone who: 1. Followed me, personally, from another thread b…
-
comment
Comment #17108135
> Today yes, but with FB's technical capabilities, I can't see why they couldn't knock off a respectable (if not superior in most respects ... clone of YouTube in way under a year.…
-
comment
Comment #17106579
> A Giant, Purposeless, Unfocused Machine Learning System. Timely, so very timely.
-
comment
Comment #17106550
> Youtube seems to offer a better user experience than facebook for users who don't have an account or aren't signed into an account. I think it's something a bit more general: Fac…
-
comment
Comment #17105447
> What sort of bizarre hedging is saying that people are just acting "perhaps like" paid Chinese trolls? You need to re-read my comment, especially the sentence after the one you p…
-
comment
Comment #17105326
> Also I find it quite telling that Lionsion still refuses to respond to any of my points. Ok, I'll bite. Here's my response: You need to go outside and take a walk , because your …
-
comment
Comment #17105202
> Would you like to respond to my points No. Please take your points to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17105121 . > in order to push your own agenda? My agenda is to stay at …
- story
-
comment
Comment #17105115
You're literally trying to carry the same derail into a new thread where it's even less on-topic? Here, I made a new post for you for your derail: https://news.ycombinator.com/item…
-
comment
Comment #17104926
> accusing the government of sending groups of real (let's define real as regular HN contributors with at least 10 karma pts) people to deflect/defend on a HN post is a technically…
-
comment
Comment #17104792
> pointing out the random articles dealing with China ever is also unrelated. (A freaking article about the Moon lander for pete's sake) Which was observed to have had anomalous co…
-
comment
Comment #17104690
I think this one will stay, but mainly because the content is an inoculation against the kind of trolling that usually leads to China threads getting buried. I do have an irrationa…
-
comment
Comment #17104651
> The thing is there's this strange, "uncanny" feeling I get whenever these things are shared too I posted this because I got super frustrated with all the derails and distractions…
-
comment
Comment #17104612
> The rating was sustained by constant comments by Chinese studying in the US and burnishing their reps with the Party. I can believe it. The Chinese government apparently paying s…
-
comment
Comment #17104452
> All governments do propaganda, this is a well known fact....Even companies astroturf. This paper isn't about that kind of propaganda, where a particular narrative gets pushed. It…
-
comment
Comment #17104380
It might be a fact (I don't know), but certainly it detracts from your point. I think you should edit out the stuff about her.
-
comment
Comment #17104369
I agree as well. Maybe she's uneducated and unintelligent, I don't know anything about her, but there are more polite ways of saying that and it distracts from the overall point.
-
comment
Comment #17104344
> Whenver there is any negative story about china, the downvotes happen immediately and "defends of the honor of china" pop up magically throwing dirt everywhere. Maybe a little, b…
-
comment
Comment #17104285
I doubt it, since that's not at all what the paper describes. Here's a quote from the abstract: > In contrast to prior claims, we show that the Chinese regime's strategy is to avoi…
-
comment
Comment #17104069
You should actually read the paper. An IP user making edits to a controversial Wikipedia page is nothing like what this paper is talking about. To summarize: 1. The Chinese governm…
-
comment
Comment #17103953
I agree. Distraction can be really disruptive to having meaningful, productive discussions. I think many people even do it reflexively even if they're not getting paid or instructe…
-
comment
Comment #17103734
This link doesn't work for you? https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/how_the_chinese_... It's the "article" link on the page, and it works for me right now.
- story
-
comment
Comment #17102613
> My point was simple. Despite the systems of trade, a catastrophic shock in trade or production systems could literally kill millions in a way that is more brutal and horrific tha…