Viewing profile — LeroyRaz
LeroyRaz
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jan 10, 2022, 8:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 597
- Public activity
- 177 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About LeroyRaz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47810567
This reads like something AI generated...
-
comment
Comment #46224138
Examples: tptacek gets an 'A' for his comment on DF which the LLM claiming that the user "captured DF's unforgiving nature, where 'can't do x or it crashes is just another feature …
-
comment
Comment #46223959
I am surprised the author thought the project passed quality control. The LLM reviews seem mostly false. Looking at the comment reviews on the actual website, the LLM seems to have…
-
comment
Comment #45883851
Hacker News readers, and especially commenters, are number 1!
-
comment
Comment #45883838
Have you read the literature? Do you have a background in machine learning or statistics? Yes. We know that LLMs can be trained by predicting the next token. This is a fact. You ca…
-
comment
Comment #45883820
I mean, yeah, statistics works. It's not that surprising that super amazing statistical modelling can approximate a distribution. Of course, thoughts, words, arguments are distribu…
-
comment
Comment #45883803
I'm not sure what you mean? Saying we understand the training process of LLMs does not mean that LLMs are not super impressive. They are shining testiments to the power of statisti…
-
comment
Comment #45883779
I think the person you are responding to is using a strange definition of "know." I think they mean "do we understand how they process information to produce their outputs" (i.e., …
-
comment
Comment #45883758
What do you mean? what do you think statistical modelling is? I am very confused by your stance. The aim of the function approximation is to maximize the likelihood of the observed…
-
comment
Comment #45883743
How is that a misconception? LLMs are just advanced statistical modelling (unsupervised machine learning) with small tweaks (e.g., some fine-tuning for human preference). At the co…
-
comment
Comment #45883663
You realize that they will gladly hallucinate science... You should check the papers it claims to reference as see if the claims it makes are actually backed up. In my experience, …
-
comment
Comment #45883549
I don't think things get better over time. What is your source for that? Here's an article (with sources) describing a massive down trend in literacy and reading comprehension: htt…
-
comment
Comment #45883502
Be careful. The models easily hallucinate problems and misdiagnose. For example, I had an issue with some GPU code, and it assured me, with utter conviction that my problem was cau…
-
comment
Comment #45707293
You make a completely false equvilance. A car person would be some kind of car person hybrid if you read it literally. Car person is acting as a short hand for "Car obsessed person…
-
comment
Comment #45698271
There's no such thing as capitalism without government. Depending on how the government regulates capitalism, you don't necessarily get wealth inequality.
-
comment
Comment #45523146
To take the example of trans: yes. Multiple different groups have genuine concerns about trans issues. For example, you have trans people wanting to be respected and not victimized…
-
comment
Comment #45522081
Chat Control seems unabashedly evil.
-
comment
Comment #45512606
This particular type of authoritarianism is primarily from the left in the west. The EU, the UK, Canada, it is the political left implementing these policies, often using them to c…
-
comment
Comment #45512555
Intolerance is the wrong framing. You should be understanding. People who throw the label "bigot" around are themselves bigots (convinced of the superiority of their own beliefs wi…
-
comment
Comment #45511466
I don't understand how the removing of right wing users is described as a necessary good to create a safe and inclusive space, while the removal of left wing users is decried as ce…
-
comment
Comment #45445011
Maybe I haven't worked on tricky enough problems, but I swear people massively hype-up the difficulty of coding. The vast majority of the time there is little difficult problem sol…
-
comment
Comment #44647299
It confused me sufficiently that I consulted the original paper to check what type of AI algorithm the research used! That was my immediate reaction to reading the sentence. Out of…
-
comment
Comment #44646928
There are two ways to interpret the sentence we are discussing: A: a grammatically incorrect statement, saying that "the AI used theory", when they mean that "the AI's design can b…
-
comment
Comment #44645945
What makes it clear to you that they don't mean what they explicitly write? What are you defending and why? Philosophical discussions aside, it is entirely possible for current AI …
-
comment
Comment #44645813
They write the "AI was probably using some esoteric theoretical principles." That is a direct quote of the article. If it was an LLM based model this could be a correct statement, …