Viewing profile — Laakeri
Laakeri
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 02, 2017, 8:25 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 178
- Public activity
- 58 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Laakeri
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41336346
There are such things, they are called "arxiv overlay journals". Couple of examples from my research area: https://www.advancesincombinatorics.com/ , https://theoretics.episciences…
-
comment
Comment #41316800
But he made a good living out of it, so in the end it was a good idea?
-
comment
Comment #40219247
I completely agree with you. My point was that the P vs NP distinction matters in practice, but of course also the subquadratic vs quadratic time distinction matters a lot.
-
comment
Comment #40214847
What are examples of natural graph related problems in P with absurd exponents? I think the reason they don't get attention is not that the algorithms are not practical, but that t…
-
comment
Comment #40213749
I'm not sure if its really misunderstanding, when in 99% cases it has turned out that if a problem is in P, then it has a polynomial-time algorithm with a quite small exponent.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #37078415
"Luck favors the prepared mind"
-
comment
Comment #35909820
For binary-encoded input it is in 2-EXPTIME by trying all graphs of size exponential in the input number and testing all subsets of the given size. Would be surprising if any hardn…
-
comment
Comment #35737844
I read the essay, and my takeaway to "There are for example four fundamental forces. Are we going to find another four?" would be: Maybe not, but we could find out that the model o…
-
comment
Comment #34398448
It's enough to just take one random element and use it as a pivot.
-
comment
Comment #34159329
For example Google hires mostly generalists and lots of people who care about income and career progression work there.
-
comment
Comment #31966719
Red Bull is not a sponsor but the owner of the team
-
comment
Comment #31644335
Well, it is also not proved to not be NP-hard, so it could also be NP-hard to our current knowledge. But you are right that researchers believe that it's not NP-hard.
-
comment
Comment #31484616
I don't know, he was a co-founder of computer science.
-
comment
Comment #30953030
arxiv.org
- comment
-
comment
Comment #27924763
Is there some fair comparison of D-Wave annealer vs classical methods on optimization problems? I remember seeing papers where it was compared to some naive methods or the runtime …
-
comment
Comment #27500000
The sycamore is really on the border of what current classical methods can simulate. You also need to consider that the funding used for building sycamore was probably orders of ma…
-
comment
Comment #26838283
Quantum computing is a prime example of a technology in phase 2, definitely not in "commercialization".
- comment
-
comment
Comment #26579951
You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.
-
comment
Comment #26578992
I think you could anyway get it from eBay with quite small overhead.
-
comment
Comment #26335122
>There's no real big theoretical problems in the quantum computer building space The current quantum computers are just on the edge of what we can simulate classically, so we can't…
-
comment
Comment #26023611
I think by Theorem 4.2 in https://math.dartmouth.edu/~pw/math100w13/haddadan.pdf the number of such shuffles required to have a positive probability on all permutations is 6.
- comment