Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Koromix

Koromix

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jul 02, 2015, 11:22 PM UTC
HN karma
140
Public activity
46 items

About Koromix

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48660433

    Interesting, it's similar to what I've done recently in Koffi 3, which is an FFI package for Node.js. I made my own C FFI layer, I did not use libffi. This works great, and got me …

  2. comment
    Comment #31378205

    The official solutions, node-ffi and node-ffi-napi, are extremely slow, with an overhead hundred of times higher than it should be. I don't know what they do to be so slow. I'm mak…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #29128522

    I think that in a proper API, we could have: int process_handle = spawn("/bin/true", SP_PAUSED); // create process but don't execute, and return a handle // most API would take a p…

  5. comment
    Comment #23582960

    Interesting, thanks for the tip! I'm gonna give it a go during the weekend.

  6. comment
    Comment #23582797

    I share this opinion as well. For centralized-repo style, which is what most teams need, the Git model has three problems: - It is hard to use. There's a reason most teams have a s…

  7. comment
    Comment #16602703

    No, I mean that the scale of whale oil use was very very small compared to the scale of fossil fuels. So small, in fact, that if whale oil was on the graph I've linked above, you w…

  8. comment
    Comment #16600460

    The volume of whale oil used back in the 19th century is laughably anecdotic compared to petroleum. When we talk about our energy needs, scale matters a lot. So yes, when it comes …

  9. comment
    Comment #16599019

    Worldwide, most of the energy that comes from wind and solar is a tiny fraction of the primary energy supply mix. Where it's growing it's mostly used for additional energy, not to …

  10. comment
    Comment #15836345

    Where the hell do you get your news from? The "massive wind and solar boom" exists only in the media. There's a rule of thumb you can follow here: the importance of a technology / …

  11. comment
    Comment #14895000

    You are right, there is pretty much nothing in biology that is. Humans are no exception, but until recently it was not a big problem because we did not have the power to significan…

  12. comment
    Comment #14893605

    > People are scared of nuclear energy for the same reason that they're scared of taking an airplane. Even though it's technically and statistically very safe, the perceived risk ap…

  13. comment
    Comment #14830842

    Many / most people exisiting now also fail to grasp how bad the future will get on our current course. They fail to realize that modern life is anything but a short-term artefact o…

  14. comment
    Comment #14827913

    > Ultimately all life on Earth will die when the sun burns out or otherwise significantly changes its output. The only hope humanity has to outlive this is taking to the stars, and…

  15. comment
    Comment #14827690

    Maybe, but I hope there are better arguments for the current system than "it works better than the Soviet Union". All you have done here is establish that an extremely dysfunctiona…

  16. comment
    Comment #14827222

    Burning through the vast energy and natural resources at our disposal is what has allowed us to "lift" so many people out of poverty. "Proposerity" and "progress" are not a miracle…

  17. comment
    Comment #14781064

    Probably nothing. This is wide-scale bike-shedding[1], basically. The real problems our unsustainable civilization faces (population overshoot, energy and fossil fuel shortage, eco…

  18. comment
    Comment #14648823

    Past civilizations did not fail because they slowed down. They slowed down while they were failing . I mean, this is what failing is. They failed at getting enough food and energy …

  19. comment
    Comment #14642745

    "The pace of the world is here to stay, people will just figure out how to sustain it with new stuff". I don't know how you can think that. The pace of our world requires incredibl…

  20. comment
    Comment #14632925

    That's interesting, thanks for the information, I'll probably spend a good portion of tomorrow reading up on this. Geoengineering is scary. Honestly, I am extremely pessimistic abo…

  21. comment
    Comment #14632575

    27% is better, though from a quick look it applies only to the US, and in Europe it looks closer to 15%. I need to take time tomorrow to find good sources on this. I'm not convince…

  22. comment
    Comment #14632139

    It was an answer to parent's "It's simply a matter of scaling up." comment. I agree with you that the exact same fact is true of nuclear. And wind too, while we're at it. I don't t…

  23. comment
    Comment #14631568

    Photovoltaic capacity is expected to be around 4674 GW in 2050 (currently around 150, I think) [1]. Let's be optimistic and say it'll actually be around 20000 GW, just for the fun …

  24. comment
    Comment #14577960

    Of course, everyone that does not buy into the myth of the Star Trek future that surely awaits mankind has to be a religious fool. Perhaps some of us have realised that, like many …

  25. comment
    Comment #12353117

    I don't hate them. I've used python more than once, and will continue to do so. And I think it's great teaching material. It's a good scripting language. But I think its drawbacks …