Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Kattywumpus

Kattywumpus

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 30, 2014, 9:53 PM UTC
HN karma
141
Public activity
42 items

About Kattywumpus

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49187970

    I don't know. Upvotes often do the same thing, especially in siloed communities. I feel like this is a larger problem -- people leaning into extremifying their views or just playin…

  2. comment
    Comment #48408870

    One analogy might be to the misleadingly named motion picture. We all have heard the stories of early cinema-goers who dove out of the way when the train on the screen barreled tow…

  3. comment
    Comment #48338250

    To be fair, it doesn't sound like anyone is literally judging this person for his moral stance -- it sounds like he is judging others for not sharing his morals. They're not making…

  4. comment
    Comment #40476123

    Interesting, especially because GPT-4o still can't tell you how many R's there are in "strawberry".

  5. comment
    Comment #29021327

    Aliens Can Watch ‘I Love Lucy’: https://www.lscheffer.com/tv.pdf

  6. comment
    Comment #28146806

    I was just re-watching "Westworld" recently, and there's a moment when Aaron Paul's character Caleb is having a telephone conversation with a sympathetic HR employee who tells him …

  7. comment
    Comment #26961877

    Let's just do away with the justice system entirely since social media seems to fulfill its functions perfectly.

  8. comment
    Comment #25735185

    As I pointed out above, this is really 20th century thinking. Social media allows for a kind of mob behavior that has shown itself antithetical to the kind of market liberalism mos…

  9. comment
    Comment #25734701

    We really need a better vocabulary for talking about this sort of thing than the 20th century terms of fascism, communism, and liberalism. I don't have the words yet, but we need t…

  10. comment
    Comment #25606719

    > For God's sake, is this where we're headed? Just ban anything that sounds offensive? Headed?

  11. comment
    Comment #24523167

    If Trump and the Republicans confirm a new Justice, Democrats have indicated they will pack the Supreme Court, appointing as many Justices as they feel necessary to get the rulings…

  12. comment
    Comment #24511909

    I think about this a lot. We are the first people in human history to see the planets up close, so to speak. For thousands of years, humans stared up at the sky and watched these l…

  13. comment
    Comment #24510066

    > I don't want to be part of a machinery that spreads misinformation and conspiracy theories. You're swearing off the internet entirely?

  14. comment
    Comment #24494808

    > We don't store any of the images uploaded or generated. Once the toonification has finished running no images are kept on our systems. I imagine this is all in good fun, but this…

  15. comment
    Comment #24481071

    I want to thank you for linking to the articles, even if you disagree with him. Calling an observation "offensive" and punishing someone for making it, is not refuting it, or even …

  16. comment
    Comment #24264522

    This should be horrifying to any sane human, but we live in a time of great insanity, and much of what ought to be criticized passes by unremarked in plain sight. > Ubuntu asserts …

  17. comment
    Comment #24188594

    I imagine others are thinking about this, too. I feel as if we are headed towards either an era of radically secured code where serious vulnerabilities become rare as hen's teeth, …

  18. comment
    Comment #20190510

    I'm going to remember this. It's a good way to have discussion if you're lucky enough to have someone who can abstract their personal views from the model that produced them.

  19. comment
    Comment #19539533

    The continued fetishizing of child-molestation fantasist, heroin-evangelist and wife-murderer William Burroughs is gross. To place photos of him on the cover of a new book holding …

  20. comment
    Comment #17220344

    Makes me wonder what a similar mod would do for video shot on a Fisher-Price PXL-2000: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=pxl-2000

  21. comment
    Comment #16754802

    I will cite this as "Hliyan's Law" from now on.

  22. comment
    Comment #16504003

    Whenever I read about this experiment, I think about Theodore Sturgeon's "Microcosmic God", and experience a moment of profound disappointment: https://tinyurl.com/microcosmicgod I…

  23. comment
    Comment #16478477

    No. I'm saying that your face is more public than your fingerprint, and that makes your phone less secure. That's not my primary reason for being against FaceID, but it's an obviou…

  24. comment
    Comment #16471800

    > FaceID doesn't "take images of your face and environment" though. From "How Apple's New FaceID Works" at Gizmodo: "Face ID starts with an image of your face, but builds on top of…

  25. comment
    Comment #16468163

    I do not want FaceID, and will resist it as long as possible. I do not want to normalize the idea that security should depend on a camera taking images of my face and environment. …