Viewing profile — Kamq
Kamq
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 02, 2022, 11:56 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,230
- Public activity
- 615 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Kamq
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49142639
> Compare an early magic staple, "Demonic Tutor" with https://bossminis.co.uk/cdn/shop/products/881e5922-b464-4a1a ... with just the box of one of the latest sets: https://unicornc…
-
comment
Comment #49123312
I don't think you're committing career suicide. I've seen people get serviceable results out of it, and it always involves reading the code in depth. Reading the code being slower …
-
comment
Comment #48735921
Their post said that load growth had a mitigating effect on prices. Not letting the data centers come online would, presumably, result in higher prices. That seems slightly weird, …
-
comment
Comment #48062191
> I just read what it produces. I don't think that's average right now.
-
comment
Comment #47999040
> Let's not pretend Microsoft has a monopoly on idiocy in the software world. Entirely fair, but let's not pretend the situation is symmetrical. Canonical doesn't have monopoly on …
-
comment
Comment #47940206
The government. You'd have to prove that the CEO knew that it would hurt the company and still did it or that it's so ridiculously negligent that any sane person should have known.…
-
comment
Comment #47912359
This is BS. A shareholder lawsuit against the CEO/board/executives for investing in the employees in the hope of long term profits would never succeed. The idea of a fiduciary duty…
-
comment
Comment #46725689
> This is true whether an AI wrote the code or a co-worker I agree. I just don't think code reviews are as load bearing as everyone seems to think. They're important, but not nearl…
-
comment
Comment #46718181
> My "actual job" isn't to write code, but to solve problems. Yes, and there's often a benefit to having a human have an understanding of the concrete details of the system when yo…
-
comment
Comment #45796191
Oh come on. They're obviously using the word "science" in this context as a shorthand for the institutions and processes we've set up to do research. Mostly because that's too many…
-
comment
Comment #44349362
> This should be the only entity that's approved to have nuclear weapons. This speaks like someone who has never been outside of a heavily bureaucratized regime. People don't get "…
-
comment
Comment #44338727
> Just because I'm a middle aged male I see trucks, and beer, and football advertisements all day long Well, yeah. Those companies will pay to send their ad to all middle aged men.…
-
comment
Comment #44338616
> Go's simplifications often introduce complexities elsewhere It does occasionally, although I'll push back on the "often". Go's simplifications allow most of the codebase to be...…
-
comment
Comment #44207431
> Equal in voting rights. Gerrymandering has been perfected by Republicans. Through that they manage to dilute votes of the opposition. This thread is talking about the Senate. The…
-
comment
Comment #44078704
> And yet so many of them kinda rule the world by running the biggest corporations in the world. Have you looked at the state of the world recently?
-
comment
Comment #44078693
> Imagine not being able to get a shitty fast food job because ... Or just moved to the US and speak too weird and don't have anyone to vouch for you. You've obviously never worked…
-
comment
Comment #43880333
> That’s incredible! The capability of an AI model is approximately junior level in the fields I’ve tested it in (programming, law, philosophy, neuroscience). If you’d don’t see an…
-
comment
Comment #43465378
> Then your industry is atypical in the type of applicants that you are getting Based on the quality of candidates that get through at other companies, I'm guessing our problem isn…
-
comment
Comment #43460955
> It’s absolutely fantastic at filtering the lower 95% of applicants because they will _never_ be able to pass. This is the part I disagree with. It hasn't been true for years. Any…
-
comment
Comment #43457504
> Leetcode is bad, but it’s bad in the sense that it errs too heavily on filtering out false negatives But, it doesn't. It filters for something orthogonal to development, which is…
-
comment
Comment #43453630
So on one hand, you're kinda right. HN is filled with exaggeration (imo often justified) from people venting because they have to deal with the bad parts of this system all day. Th…
-
comment
Comment #43446150
> Rust's ? operator - effective and ergonomic It is, but it's also subtle, and if you want branches (especially sad-path branches) to be explicit, that's not a good thing.
-
comment
Comment #43222453
> I hear outright wrong arguments for why the USA has not moved to a modern filing system. The argument I always hear from the right about this is that they worry that making taxes…
-
comment
Comment #43166458
Fair, but I'd prefer phone over a poorly done app. And given the state of most apps...
-
comment
Comment #43064639
> This is at best specious reasoning, and to me reflects that the blogger completely misses the point of having tests. I mean, yeah. Most devs don't understand the point. It turns …