Viewing profile — JyB
JyB
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 03, 2017, 4:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 278
- Public activity
- 177 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About JyB
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49208091
You are unfortunately right. I am a bit relieved because it seem generics don't seem that over-used in the community. But still, the language lost a lot with this change that felt …
-
comment
Comment #49208059
That's funny because that's factually untrue. Go's early popularity and professional adoption were largely driven by its perceived productivity boost linked in part to the small su…
-
comment
Comment #49207983
That's actually very popular with pretty much anyone who's dealt with errors happening in programs... which I would assume is most devs after some time.
-
comment
Comment #49207743
Right. On a related note: "MCP is invisible to the LLM, or should be, under normal use". I am not convinced there are any downsides for the harness to explicitly feed MCP keywords …
-
comment
Comment #49183345
Not sure I understand what you mean. MCP servers and methods available do have to be visible to the model in some way so that it can spit out tool calls instructions to be executed…
-
comment
Comment #48646133
While that is true, the overarching point is that it fundamentally still is, just a story. You're just describing real world consequences, precisely because humans/societies believ…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47946640
What credentials related to software engineering? Please expand and do not post nebulous comments like these.
-
comment
Comment #47929143
Courage is not the appropriate word
-
comment
Comment #47881895
This specifically is super annoying.
-
comment
Comment #47775074
Restrictions don’t have to be confusing, they can be clear. You are missing the whole point.
-
comment
Comment #47410774
> modern MCP clients do smart tool search that obviates the entire "I am sending the full list of tools back and forth" mode of operation This has always surprised me as this alway…
-
comment
Comment #47056536
I don’t know if you’re being serious but that’s laughable
-
comment
Comment #46056366
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #46050686
How is that specific to antigravity? Seem like it could happen with a bunch of tools
-
comment
Comment #46041453
That’s exactly what it is in essence. The MCP protocol simply doesn’t have any mechanism specifications (yet) for not loading tools completely in the context. There’s nothing reall…
-
comment
Comment #46041421
The MCP standard will and has to evolve to address this context issue. It’s a no brainer and this is a perfect example of the direction mcp is going / will go. There’s fundamentall…
-
comment
Comment #45895998
In also interested in n8n. From what I gathered it’s a everything baked in app, not a lib. Meaning that unless you re doing upstream contributions you don’t actually code anything.…
-
comment
Comment #45895954
Concurrency. Unless you’re happy stopping the world on llm io… Go excels at handling network calls and the like. It’s basically what agents are.
-
comment
Comment #45610695
I think you are right.
-
comment
Comment #45609573
Claude Skills just seem to be the same as MCP prompts: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-06-18/ser... I don't really see why they had to create a different concept…
-
comment
Comment #45609467
I'm super confused as well. This seems like exactly that, just some default prompt injections to chose from. I guess I kinda understand them in the context of their claude chat UI …
-
comment
Comment #45348662
I never understand why there's always one of the top comment on every Go post being derogatory and mentioning Rust. It never fails. It starts to feel like a weird mix of defensiven…
-
comment
Comment #45039393
No one think any form of "prompt engineering" "guardrails" are serious security measures right?
-
comment
Comment #44882961
Assuming you're using GitHub or similar, make pushing branches and creating PRs part of their prompts, and review on the GitHub app or equivalent? Seem like an orthogonal problem t…