Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — JimmieMcnulty

JimmieMcnulty

HN member
Joined
Fri, Aug 12, 2022, 6:42 AM UTC
HN karma
77
Public activity
82 items

About JimmieMcnulty

JimmieMcnulty@proton.me

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #32879054

    Uh, what? White males have been speaking freely (and continue to do so) for as long as the concept of racial hierarchy has existed. The American tech industry is run by (straight) …

  3. comment
    Comment #32879016

    Well, it may be possible for you to simply not talk about politics, but for folks who have their rights stripped away, their water made undrinkable, their loved ones ripped from th…

  4. comment
    Comment #32878996

    What's funny is that none of the big tech firms would need to change their policies or behaviors, should this actually become the law of the land, as there are currently no policie…

  5. comment
    Comment #32878712

    Everything here seems pretty fine (if basic), So often I see engineers screw this up, usually by forgetting a few things: * They only have some of the information, and don’t accoun…

  6. comment
  7. comment
    Comment #32868659

    (One of) the largest retailers in the world also does this, I believe.

  8. comment
    Comment #32867531

    What annoys me is your continued refusal to acknowledge the unfair lack of recourse available for someone who disagrees with a decision you’ve made, and your flippant attitude arou…

  9. comment
  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #32859435

    Yes, because you can easily know the owners of every American corporation today.[0] This policy was updated in December of 2021. But, again, completely irrelevant to the broader to…

  12. comment
    Comment #32858913

    Contradiction?

  13. comment
    Comment #32858910

    The fact that you equate "privacy" with "warrants as a concept" is kind of sad, but I doubt you're capable of learning better, given your pretty terrible attitude thusfar.

  14. comment
    Comment #32858731

    > Users here are extremely quick to push back if we do something they find objectionable. This is simply not true; you act like you're the only person who's been around here for 15…

  15. comment
    Comment #32854219

    That's your opinion, and fortunately not one that nearly anyone shares. You're doing a common Internet Thing by twisting a conversation into the topic you actually want to talk abo…

  16. comment
    Comment #32854204

    Housing supply is increasing, just not where you feel entitled to live. Move somewhere else! Tons of houses are constantly being built where I live, in a flyover state. Not everyon…

  17. comment
    Comment #32854180

    And 7 hours later, ETH is down ~10%.

  18. comment
    Comment #32853275

    Nope, not privacy related at all. I should know who I'm doing business with.

  19. comment
    Comment #32853267

    I can both believe in the concept of a warrant and wish to hide my identity from people like you.

  20. comment
    Comment #32843539

    Because we all agree that warrants do need to exist to catch bad guys... I refuse to continue a discussion with someone who doesn't believe in the concept of a warrant.

  21. comment
    Comment #32843244

    > People are getting prosecuted, criminally, right now. Name one person who is being prosecuted for obtaining an abortion, and that prosecution is moving forward due to evidence co…

  22. comment
    Comment #32842976

    I'm glad you recognize how fundamentally different the world is today than how it was in the 1930s, because not realizing that would probably confuse the hell out of you a lot of t…

  23. comment
    Comment #32842952

    Again, I get that bad things happen, but none of what you've brought up would have been prevented with better privacy in practice. It's well beyond "privacy" to believe that owners…

  24. comment
    Comment #32842929

    So your most recent widespread example is 80+ years ago, and then a very tiny hypothetical set of lawsuits that have not been filed (zero prosecutions are "under way")?

  25. comment
    Comment #32840032

    You could try bringing up relevant situations where a breach of privacy was the proximate cause of a systemic negative consequence on a large scale, rather than irrelevant-but-also…