Viewing profile — Jabanga

>There is no reason to expect that their subset of the population should conform to a general population skew. Absurd. Differences in the general population will translate into dif…

There is nothing to debate against, unfortunately. If I'm being repetitive, it's because the justifications for the firing are so utterly baseless. Also, if the upvote/downvote rat…

>what difference does the statistical differences found between genders in the general population matter for any small subset of that population? With all due respect, this is an a…

The EPI is heavily funded by labour unions which have a major stake in the continued acceptance of central tenets of Marxist/postmodernist ideology, like the existence of race/gend…

>Were it offered merely as a factor which explained some subset of the gender imbalances in STEM, that would be more reasonable. Yes that is a more accurate construction. For the s…

The article that is linked here is written by a PhD in sexual neuroscience, and defends the claims made in the memo as scientifically valid. Instead of responding to the memo, and …

It seems people are fiddling and being their agreeable selves while Rome burns. A Google engineer was just fired, with deafening applause from a multitude of voices, for penning a …

>You're correct, it is a hateful, sexist comment, and I won't take it back or apologize for it. Then you're choosing to not be constructive. Sexism and racism are not constructive,…

They could very plausibly explain the differences in the number of men who write software relative to women. The only explanation is absolutely not "systemic discrimination against…

>STEM fields, especially applied rather than theoretical ones, involve people as much as things This doesn't negate my point. You're correct that I oversimplified: some STEM fields…

Of course there's more to consider than evolutionary psychology.. No one disputes that. What many postmodernists, especially feminists, dispute, is that evolutionary psychology has…

Why? What will I learn?

>The first bullet point is "women are more people oriented". No, the first bullet point is: >Women on average show a higher interest in people and men in things Which is true, and …

Notice how you're not actually agreeing or disagreeing with my assertion. You're simple trying to justify the postmodernist take on truth.

I did not say that you're a "hateful, dogmatic, sexist racist". I said that postmodernism and feminism are. Very few people subscribe to all of the beliefs of a particular ideologi…

You're confirming my statement: truth to post modernism doesn't exist as the term is conventionally defined. It is only one particular group's frame of reference and therefore only…

Can you at least admit that your initial comment: that he "defends discrimination against women", is unfounded?

"people like you" another hateful comment and personal attack.

>These 2 lines essentially state that as women are more interested in people, there are some roles they might not be able to perform. That's absurd. You're not even interpreting hi…

Postmodernists and feminists are generally very critical toward evolutionary psychology and hostile toward its scholars, so you're actually supporting my point.

That is the postmodern anti-science belief, which assumes that truth is not really truth. It is just a device used in power struggles between identity groups. It's so extreme that …

No, postmodernism and feminism are rooted in Marxist ideology. Marxist intellectuals shifted to postmodernism in the 1970s after it became impossible to deny that Marxist doctrine …

Do you believe these comments defend discrimination against women? I'm trying to understand how one could see it that way. I see both of these statements as unquestionably true, an…

This is toxic postmodernist/feminist dogma. It frames everything through a lens of identity power struggles. Therefore, whether an argument is scientific and factual is secondary t…