Viewing profile — JAlexoid
JAlexoid
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 12, 2011, 2:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,891
- Public activity
- 1,761 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About JAlexoid
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49225633
Even being stored in EU doesn't preclude your data from being targeted by signals intelligence. Which is different than requiring US based companies to provide non-US data to Ameri…
-
comment
Comment #49194574
I agree. Operating systems have become too fast.
-
comment
Comment #49002519
It reads like you're in favor of banning resale and lending(aka libraries) of books... because the authors aren't compensated. There's such a thing as fair use and digitizing priva…
-
comment
Comment #49002498
You seem to think that AI companies sell you content, which is false. You get a service. The service is using their compute power to run a model and their scientists to build the m…
-
comment
Comment #49002460
Long story short - publishing houses are venture capital firms. Most of their investments fail miserably, but they only need one Google/Stephen King.
-
comment
Comment #49002434
Since we're on the criminal side - what criminal statute would apply to Anthropic? And what criminal statutes were used for the cases we're supposed to compare to?
-
comment
Comment #49002413
Infringement is a civil lawsuit, with financial punishment only.
-
comment
Comment #49002397
Maybe because Anthropic isn't actively facilitating copyright infringement?..
-
comment
Comment #49002374
I used to use the initial letters of a whole paragraph from Lord of The Rings as my password. Some of us have a good enough memory.
-
comment
Comment #48746231
You're not understanding this. A company can create a new search engine and Google Search isn't obligated to even mention it. The issue is when achieving market dominance and new s…
-
comment
Comment #48746037
We're talking about a layman. Not to mention that different genres have different quality of AI music. I would easily recognize AI generated orchestra, while I can bet a lot of mon…
-
comment
Comment #48745965
You're absolutely right. They can just come up with a few thousand dollars per hour for a few hours per song. Everyone has a few thousand dollars just lying around
-
comment
Comment #48724278
Because AI music can be still valuable. People who like to write lyrics, but can't afford to pay a vocalist still deserve to get their art materialized and distributed.
-
comment
Comment #48723870
We have a lot of pop-slop, now it's AI slop. There's a reason why a few artists persist through the decades, while others just fade into obscurity.(think of how long Madonna, Cher …
-
comment
Comment #48723830
AI generated music is good, the singing (vocals and lyrics) is typically very bad. AI generated music is also not at all original. Which scares all of the "artists" who lack origin…
-
comment
Comment #48723803
I think we underestimate how much of reading happens from the shallow romance section of the bookstores. It's big business and is really not that deep. For someone who isn't part o…
-
comment
Comment #47946913
AFIK: Even the slightest modification of the work is transformative and will produce copyrighted material. It does not have to be substantial transformation.
-
comment
Comment #47400476
I stand corrected. It was a very recent addition
-
comment
Comment #47321840
Unfortunately you did grant that permission. Once you granted the permission for someone to hold a copy, they have the permission to process it. I can assure you, that you didn't g…
-
comment
Comment #47321777
Charging for a service isn't rent-seeking.
-
comment
Comment #47321753
Funny thing is that building an LLM isn't as complex as you might think. But the problem of attribution is easily understandable to any human with a modicum of intelligence. Imagin…
-
comment
Comment #47319999
I don't believe that you require to do much to claim copyright over an output of an LLM. The input prompt is under copyright - a simple modification to the source code will grant c…
-
comment
Comment #47319978
Software is considered a complete piece of work. Therefore as long as you modify a single character - that whole product is under your copyright.
-
comment
Comment #47319890
The only problem that people see in these models is the money flows. If it all was non-profit - then no one would raise the ethical issue.
-
comment
Comment #47319878
Currently it's mostly to pay for running and training the models.