Viewing profile — Imbue
Imbue
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Apr 25, 2009, 8:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 7
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Imbue
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #4781444
My question was why is a proper MAC better than appending a checksum to the plain text and then encrypting. With an appended and encrypted checksum, the system could easily reject …
-
comment
Comment #4780776
But if someone chooses a ciphertext (without knowing the key), how could they get the checksum right (which is also encrypted)? If the checksum was wrong, the system would refuse t…
-
comment
Comment #4779616
Why is a proper MAC preferred over simply encrypting the plaintext after appending a checksum or hash.
-
comment
Comment #4708207
His reasoning is actually quite flawed. Even if you believe there is somehow a black and white $7.7 trillion value difference between candidates, betting on such long odds still is…
-
comment
Comment #1740834
Not sure if I am understanding this correctly. By bootstrapping, do you mean C does only the most basic syntax parsing, and then a fexl script (written in a basic fexl subset) does…
-
comment
Comment #1685327
It sounds like you're having a lot of fun with it. I think a C implementation would be better anyway. C is the common denominator between almost every language. Have you already do…
-
comment
Comment #1674077
I'm not trying to rush you or anything. Just want to let you know that at least one person is still looking forward to seeing it.
-
comment
Comment #1600110
Great! I'll be looking forward to it. I kind of have a thing for small languages.
-
comment
Comment #1599003
This is probably a stupid question. If you have Fexl written in Perl now, what are the chances of just throwing a sand-boxed interpreter online for people to play with? I'm thinkin…
-
comment
Comment #1598747
Is Fexl open-source, or even available for download? It looks pretty neat.