Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — IanCal

IanCal

HN member
Joined
Fri, Oct 05, 2012, 9:20 PM UTC
HN karma
11,728
Public activity
4,759 items

About IanCal

Short-term AI/GPT/LLM consulting services to help you strategize, discuss, and navigate the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence. Discover how these powerful tools can transform your business.

There's no need to hire a full-time consultant when you only need guidance for a few hours or days. I can quickly help you develop a solid plan that your existing engineers can build upon.

Offering simple and flexible contracts, I am available for clients in the EU, UK, US, and AUS/NZ time zones (with advance notice for synchronous meetings).

Pricing:

£1200 for a half-day £2000 for a full day

For inquiries, please contact Ian at ian@redbirddata.co.uk

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49221833

    Could you imagine a scenario where from warning to complete evacuation takes more than two days? Evacuating a whole area is a hard task, particularly once you start looking at more…

  2. comment
    Comment #49207778

    — Spoilers, if you’ve not read this and yet are still reading this comment chain I guess the grooming may start earlier, it’s not really discussed and it’s a bit ambiguous as to wh…

  3. comment
    Comment #49202678

    s/model/engineer

  4. comment
    Comment #49138956

    Oh I mean LLMs are the opposite, they’re not the same blind optimisation thing weirdly watching you with no core understanding. They’re great for this kind of thing.

  5. comment
    Comment #49134520

    Tbf if I don’t enjoy that aspect and it saves me a day or so per year that I can use for consulting instead it makes sense to do that trade. Two and a half perhaps including taxes.…

  6. comment
    Comment #49134498

    They didn’t say fibre didnt matter. They disagreed they should care more about fibre than any other.

  7. comment
    Comment #49134461

    Recommendation algorithms are, frankly, weird as a user. Something watches your tiny interactions and, with zero concept of anything happening, gets surprisingly good at predicting…

  8. comment
    Comment #49121475

    I think you’re right, my base assumption is that the models can code and can fix bugs, and can code more in parallel and faster than humans at a lower cost. If Google are tackling …

  9. comment
    Comment #49121455

    This is the research taste part - often they can be good but human experts are really good at this (also you know your codebase, without the prompt these models have no other backg…

  10. comment
    Comment #49115535

    I can say a portrait doesn’t look like a person even if I can’t do better, googles product range is an absolute mess and using it is a nightmare - I don’t know how to fix the compa…

  11. comment
    Comment #49114777

    What’s it a prediction of?

  12. comment
    Comment #49113617

    The question of agency and the question of income are different. The former - we do things manually that can be automated for fun all the time and make entirely arbitrary weird thi…

  13. comment
    Comment #49113576

    > Google acting like a normal but competent company that's just chugging away, Chugging away not releasing products or releasing ones worse than their competition typically. Not su…

  14. comment
    Comment #49107139

    IMO that doesn’t sound so much like prediction any more. It’d be prediction if it’s “predict what would come next in this text sampled from distribution X”. But what’s it predictin…

  15. comment
    Comment #49107093

    It’s always been nebulous but that was fine because we were so incredibly far away from it. We never really planned to be close to it figuring out the edge. Some have it at human o…

  16. comment
    Comment #49089958

    We have those laws. You need consent regardless of how you get the data. That’s they say “we value your data” (a phrase you can read in two ways) and ask if 1368 partners can have …

  17. comment
    Comment #49089943

    Browser fingerprinting is not cookies. Cookies are a very specific technical thing.

  18. comment
    Comment #49089934

    GDPR is not about cookies, and what data do you mean? The data about how you use the site, tied to anything they can identify you with?

  19. comment
    Comment #49085195

    It might be that what we consider a basic and very hard puzzle are extremely close together on a more absolute scale. The difference is often for us what proportion of humans can s…

  20. comment
    Comment #49061617

    It’s not about cookies. It’s about what the site is allowed to do with your data. Cookies are an implementation detail. It’s baffling we’re having this misunderstanding on this sit…

  21. comment
    Comment #49061592

    In a way it is - or rather it wouldn’t t change anything if we added more features. The default is “no”. Without explicit consent you can’t do a lot of things. You can’t have a def…

  22. comment
    Comment #49046027

    Utter nonsense. There’s no way you could get models as smart by fine tuning. I couldn’t throw a problem like “build a pokemon database with UI to teach my son sql” and get a workin…

  23. comment
    Comment #49045566

    > I've worked with these systems for four years now and they have not meaningfully improved in that time frame. Not meaningfully improved?! Four years ago was gpt *3.5*! ChatGPT ha…

  24. comment
    Comment #49042601

    Huge fan of the non-seat/monthly based pricing. Do you need it to be higher to not just cover costs but also make a profit?

  25. comment
    Comment #48985746

    > What am I missing? They’re testing the same models on the same task but different ways of organising the swarms and the new approach works better.