Viewing profile — IIJamesII

I'm saying it's a glaringly bad strategy. Buy hey, continue trotting out complete and utter hypocrites to lecture us on what ought to feed our families for dinner.

"one person could have flown coach from New York to Japan (and back) 3,408 TIMES with the amount of fuel the Governator used to commute within California." Who does he think he is …

If followed conscientiously by those who really think this way - this approach really might benefit future generations.

Yes. Kyle Simpson rocks. He is smart and he looks deeply into things. He is opinionated and I like that too. I learn more when I see smart opinionated people disagree with each oth…

>"1. The laws of physics were proven to false and it turned out the CO2 does not trap energy in the atmosphere." Most skeptics agree that CO2 traps energy in the atmosphere. By its…

I was also wondering how they successfully rule out other possibilities. Many people seem very eager to believe. Some skepticism here can help aid a more thorough understanding.

The very notion that the climate will amplify CO2 heating by as much as 4.5 times should raise red flags. Without all that extra heat amplification there is no global catastrophe a…

Haha, no. I'm genuinely new and my account is 18 days old. But I can see why many people wouldn't want to be identified as 'deniers' if that's what you mean?

Sure. The big example is "climate sensitivity". Basically the models assume the earth's climate will amplify any CO2 heating by an extra 3 - 4 times. Without that extra heat there …

Are you asking in good faith? You seem to assume right off the bat that anybody who is skeptical is irrational since there is a "massive collection of solid data pointing towards t…