Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Hywan

Hywan

HN member
Joined
Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 2:51 PM UTC
HN karma
42
Public activity
16 items

About Hywan

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47216003

    How different is it from the semantic Web (schema, RDF, OWL…)? Instead of reinventing something, why not using a well established technology that can also be beneficial for other u…

  2. comment
    Comment #47135618

    In this article, I illustrate how Data-oriented Design helped to remove annoying memory pressure and lock contention in multiple sorters used in the Matrix Rust SDK. It has improve…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #45346543

    Thanks for mentioning this other possibility! To be honest, I've discovered this possibility from you. Sadly, it doesn't improve the performance that much. We get the following per…

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #27548457

    WebAssembly only supports i32, i64, f32, and f64 for the moment. So you need to allocate the string manually inside the Wasm memory, then pass the pointer of that string to the Was…

  7. comment
    Comment #27548433

    The wasmer-c-api lands in https://github.com/wasmerio/wasmer/tree/master/lib/c-api , with the documentation being accessible at https://wasmerio.github.io/wasmer/crates/wasmer_c_ap…

  8. comment
    Comment #27502686

    At my work, we have developped `loupe`, a Rust crate that does precisely that, https://github.com/wasmerio/loupe/ . I'm the main author of it. `loupe` provides the `MemoryUsage` tr…

  9. story
  10. story
  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #19676111

    I recommend this excellent reading, https://00f.net/2018/11/25/webassembly-doesnt-make-unsafe-la... . It clarifies what “safe” means in this context.

  13. comment
    Comment #19676100

    The best way to help right now is to test it, and report any issues! I've been able to try it on Windows so far for instance. Also the API isn't complete. We need to be able to gro…

  14. comment
    Comment #19676090

    That's true. However, it allows to integrate your Wasm program to your favorite framework more easily. It's likely to be a small surface of code to review carefully. It's always a …

  15. comment
    Comment #19671420

    We don't support that yet, but we are working on it. It's not that easy even if the theory is kind of simple to explain. The implementation in the different backends is mostly the …

  16. comment
    Comment #19254723

    No, it's not :-), see https://words.steveklabnik.com/is-webassembly-the-return-of-...