Viewing profile — Horos
Horos
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 09, 2025, 6:22 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 8
- Public activity
- 40 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Horos
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47499959
what about mcp cdp ? my claude drive his own brave autonomously, even for ui ?
-
comment
Comment #47401213
right — no variance, question was off target. worth noting though: the sema-bounded WriteAt goroutines are structurally a fan-out over homogeneous units, even if the pipeline feels…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47380425
dead link ?
-
comment
Comment #47370312
this makes sense for your workload, but may the right primitive be a function of your payload profile and business constraints ? in my case the problem doesn't arise because contro…
-
comment
Comment #47364328
had a look ?
-
comment
Comment #47362526
fair point on blocking sends — but that's an implementation detail, not a structural one. From my pov, the worker pool's job isn't to absorb saturation. it's to make capacity expli…
-
comment
Comment #47361846
Isn't a dedicated worker pool with priority queues enough to get predictable P99 without leaving Go? If you fix N workers and control dispatch order yourself, the scheduler barely …
-
comment
Comment #47335917
Thanks for sharing — always a pleasure to discover what others are building. A few thoughts after your answers: The E2E file sync part has existing solutions, and your access right…
-
comment
Comment #47335279
even thoses replies create common value. Tomorow datasets. Keep publishing !
-
comment
Comment #47301541
ACID & Idempotent. dataplane / controlplane. dryruns et runbook automations. llm does not act on production. he build scripts, and you take the greatest care of theses scripts. Clo…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47292324
who believe here that saying no is possible ?
-
comment
Comment #47274178
The "job as library" pattern is simple: instead of wiring jobs into main or a framework, you split into 3 things. Your queue is a struct with New(db) — it knows submit, poll, compl…
-
comment
Comment #47273983
And to put it plainly: we won't be able to manage LLM-generated contributions without LLMs. It's physically impossible at this scale. Which means the immune system has to be built …
-
comment
Comment #47273782
Something worth sitting with, rather than a conclusion: As PR velocity reaches this scale — 100 per hour, hundreds of thousands of lines a day — I find myself wondering about the c…
-
comment
Comment #47273710
I've set a fully async patern. blobs chunked into sqlite shards. It's a blind fire n forget go worker danse. wich can be hold as monitoreed or scale as multiple instances if needed…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47266340
Three real risks in your current approach before anything else. Shared references mutate silently — in JS, objects passed between your "tables" are aliases, not copies, so a mutati…
-
comment
Comment #47261551
Quick question before going further: is this an exercise in language internals, or do you have a concrete use case in mind? Asking because the answer changes the architecture signi…
-
comment
Comment #47260915
Nice try — the local-first distributed pattern worth building on. Three questions: Why blockchain for access rights? A signed Merkle structure or a Certificate Transparency-style l…