Viewing profile — HiJon89
HiJon89
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 27, 2013, 5:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 138
- Public activity
- 53 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About HiJon89
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49175326
> “Humans of course can drive with just eyes, so there’s that proof of existence,” he said. “If the goal were to just approximately match human performance or to build an assist pr…
-
comment
Comment #49027068
> Specifically, I think it would be perfectly cromulent to have JsonArray.of() be able to support any Iterable of native Strings, Integers, Doubles, or Booleans; that doesn't feel …
-
comment
Comment #42431576
Using observed latency, power of two choices, and requests in flight reminds me a lot of Finagle https://twitter.github.io/finagle/guide/Clients.html#p2c-lea...
-
comment
Comment #41934431
Not sure I follow. The function coloring problem is still solved in that scenario. You can apply structured concurrency to any function (there’s no colors), and any function can co…
-
comment
Comment #39941402
Really cool analysis and visualizations! Although there’s an interesting wrinkle with Mario Kart 8 + 200cc - most players don’t want speed over a certain level because you’re too f…
-
comment
Comment #35538405
My Plex lifetime pass is still going strong
-
comment
Comment #35258922
> > Another common example is when you are implementing an interface method or overriding a superclass method > This doesn't seem to be supported and could cause many issues e.g. i…
-
comment
Comment #35257875
A common example is try-with-resources where you don't actually need the resource and are just using it for the closing effect. For example, let's say you have a metrics library th…
-
comment
Comment #35012640
What if your system is the one actually sending the emails (ie, you are the 3rd party in this scenario)
-
comment
Comment #34991905
When do you record the message as processed? If you do it before the processing is complete, you have at-most-once delivery (because processing could fail after you've recorded it …
-
comment
Comment #34990646
What if the receiver process fails? How do you know which messages it processed successfully? You can shuffle the problem around indefinitely but it doesn’t go away. If your proces…
-
comment
Comment #34719148
Thanks for making the previous poster’s point for them.
-
comment
Comment #33798980
Thanks for the great writeup and the great work! The fact that half the comments here are dismissive or condescending is such a sad indictment of HN culture :(
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33227735
With 2 million users, I imagine it would be on the order of thousands of posts per day, and maybe hundreds of reports?
-
comment
Comment #32531141
How would that work for something like S3 range requests? Rather than reading an entire object sequentially (which would work fine with transparent compression) you can also ask to…
-
comment
Comment #31539813
There was a later tweet clarifying that an update (presumably over-the-air) was released in 2021 but for some reason not all devices received it. Quote: Now it seems an update was …
-
comment
Comment #31173141
I expected the top comment on hackernews to be something this pedantic and irrelevant to the content, and I was not disappointed
-
comment
Comment #31112024
We don’t need to write a test that tests this function as a whole, we can test the parts we care about independently. What could possibly go wrong :)
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #30047444
Limited driver assist? Are all the videos of people using Tesla full self-driving on YouTube fake?
-
comment
Comment #28225981
Or maybe the sad state is that there are still people dying every day from a pandemic THAT WE HAVE A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE VACCINE FOR.
-
comment
Comment #26166122
I had to read that sentence a couple of times but I think it’s just poorly worded. He’s not saying that the person is old, he’s saying that the reason for wanting to fire them “you…