Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — HiJon89

HiJon89

HN member
Joined
Wed, Feb 27, 2013, 5:52 PM UTC
HN karma
138
Public activity
53 items

About HiJon89

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49175326

    > “Humans of course can drive with just eyes, so there’s that proof of existence,” he said. “If the goal were to just approximately match human performance or to build an assist pr…

  2. comment
    Comment #49027068

    > Specifically, I think it would be perfectly cromulent to have JsonArray.of() be able to support any Iterable of native Strings, Integers, Doubles, or Booleans; that doesn't feel …

  3. comment
    Comment #42431576

    Using observed latency, power of two choices, and requests in flight reminds me a lot of Finagle https://twitter.github.io/finagle/guide/Clients.html#p2c-lea...

  4. comment
    Comment #41934431

    Not sure I follow. The function coloring problem is still solved in that scenario. You can apply structured concurrency to any function (there’s no colors), and any function can co…

  5. comment
    Comment #39941402

    Really cool analysis and visualizations! Although there’s an interesting wrinkle with Mario Kart 8 + 200cc - most players don’t want speed over a certain level because you’re too f…

  6. comment
    Comment #35538405

    My Plex lifetime pass is still going strong

  7. comment
    Comment #35258922

    > > Another common example is when you are implementing an interface method or overriding a superclass method > This doesn't seem to be supported and could cause many issues e.g. i…

  8. comment
    Comment #35257875

    A common example is try-with-resources where you don't actually need the resource and are just using it for the closing effect. For example, let's say you have a metrics library th…

  9. comment
    Comment #35012640

    What if your system is the one actually sending the emails (ie, you are the 3rd party in this scenario)

  10. comment
    Comment #34991905

    When do you record the message as processed? If you do it before the processing is complete, you have at-most-once delivery (because processing could fail after you've recorded it …

  11. comment
    Comment #34990646

    What if the receiver process fails? How do you know which messages it processed successfully? You can shuffle the problem around indefinitely but it doesn’t go away. If your proces…

  12. comment
    Comment #34719148

    Thanks for making the previous poster’s point for them.

  13. comment
    Comment #33798980

    Thanks for the great writeup and the great work! The fact that half the comments here are dismissive or condescending is such a sad indictment of HN culture :(

  14. comment
  15. comment
    Comment #33227735

    With 2 million users, I imagine it would be on the order of thousands of posts per day, and maybe hundreds of reports?

  16. comment
    Comment #32531141

    How would that work for something like S3 range requests? Rather than reading an entire object sequentially (which would work fine with transparent compression) you can also ask to…

  17. comment
    Comment #31539813

    There was a later tweet clarifying that an update (presumably over-the-air) was released in 2021 but for some reason not all devices received it. Quote: Now it seems an update was …

  18. comment
    Comment #31173141

    I expected the top comment on hackernews to be something this pedantic and irrelevant to the content, and I was not disappointed

  19. comment
    Comment #31112024

    We don’t need to write a test that tests this function as a whole, we can test the parts we care about independently. What could possibly go wrong :)

  20. story
  21. story
  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #30047444

    Limited driver assist? Are all the videos of people using Tesla full self-driving on YouTube fake?

  24. comment
    Comment #28225981

    Or maybe the sad state is that there are still people dying every day from a pandemic THAT WE HAVE A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE VACCINE FOR.

  25. comment
    Comment #26166122

    I had to read that sentence a couple of times but I think it’s just poorly worded. He’s not saying that the person is old, he’s saying that the reason for wanting to fire them “you…