Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Hexstream

Hexstream

HN member
Joined
Wed, Aug 22, 2007, 4:52 PM UTC
HN karma
3,090
Public activity
1,649 items

About Hexstream

20+ years of programming, 15+ years of Common Lisp, 10+ years of Common Lisp Open Source.

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/hexstream; my proof: https://keybase.io/hexstream/sigs/LEcxc2CHs5onKwnA7vtRPPYzR00wDTaKI3kCKUhdYXI ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #25333745

    No, my bubble just needs a bit of funding so I can be even more effective at contributing to Common Lisp Open Source.

  2. comment
    Comment #25326822

    I am assuming he would not say that if he deeply hated college dropouts and did not want to acknowledge their success.

  3. comment
    Comment #25326804

    Thank you. I am aiming to help make Common Lisp (or a close descendant) a top 5 programming language by 2040. I believe this is eminently achievable given proper approaches, and fu…

  4. comment
    Comment #25326744

    The point of the fundraiser is to enable me to concentrate almost all my energy on Common Lisp Open Source instead of having to divert energy elsewhere due to financial concerns. G…

  5. comment
    Comment #25325767

    I can't immediately find where in his essays he talked favorably about college dropouts, but there is this: https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1110248609545703425

  6. comment
    Comment #25325585

    It is chaotic, I'll give you that. This is a direct reflection of the chaotic state of the Common Lisp community and of all the hard work that is going to be required to bring it t…

  7. comment
    Comment #25325336

    My CV and other writings and most especially my work itself pretty extensively justify that I'm the right person for the job. Of course, it's probably pretty hard to tell without s…

  8. comment
    Comment #25325199

    > It does not help to "prove" an assertion by making further unsubstantiated assertions. Exactly, so stop doing that, then. Including sealioning. > Why is Lisp the "best programmin…

  9. comment
    Comment #25325121

    Did you mean to present an argument of some sort?

  10. comment
    Comment #25324511

    Simple syntax is just one of countless crucial features. Here is just a trivial sample: https://twitter.com/HexstreamSoft/status/1334220825281654785 Fairly extensive advocacy piece…

  11. comment
    Comment #25321447

    This is dead serious. Do you find the idea of funding Common Lisp Open Source abhorrent? Because that is the primary focus of my work and my life. Do you think this would have more…

  12. comment
    Comment #25321163

    I am creating tons of Common Lisp community resources that definitely help attract a more diverse audience to Common Lisp, incidentally. (Not everyone is comfortable with the "pop …

  13. comment
    Comment #25320931

    Common Lisp really IS the best programming language in the world, though. This is a statement of fact. We could do a better job of proving it and demonstrating it to the world, and…

  14. comment
    Comment #25320802

    I would like to review your Common Lisp credentials.

  15. comment
    Comment #25320682

    The Common Lisp Revival 2020 Fundraiser is mostly oriented towards people who understand the value of Common Lisp. Thank you.

  16. comment
    Comment #25320629

    Thank you for your interest. I believe you are looking for the Common Lisp Revival 2020 Fundraiser pitch: https://github.com/sponsors/Hexstream

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #4709872

    tl;dr: I'd very much like a "noprocrast front-page only" or "comment threads ignore noprocrast" checkbox. I have a huge noprocrast. Having to /logout just to check out a story or i…

  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #2497704

    Nothing for Rete? Come on . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rete_algorithm

  21. comment
    Comment #2401935

    It's a gender-neutral pronoun. (Great concept in theory but looks stupid and won't catch on, IMHO.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spivak_pronouns

  22. comment
    Comment #2338808

    In Common Lisp we have optional type declarations, and a common strategy for implementations (for SBCL, say) is to treat such declarations as assertions by default, leading to more…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #2277254

    I find your lack of parentheses disturbing. I'd personally prefer: (b-when foo (plusp 1) (frob foo)) These implementations also don't handle declarations correctly ;P A surprisingl…

  25. comment
    Comment #2214494

    At the cost (among other things) of not being able to pass functions as arguments, though that could be worked around.