Viewing profile — Helianthus
Helianthus
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 03, 2010, 5:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,063
- Public activity
- 491 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Helianthus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #8798507
Which is an attempt to actively legislate morality--not that I necessarily disagree with you. I mean more to point out that there is a certain despair in choosing (what I see as) a…
-
comment
Comment #8180560
Why should he? You clearly haven't repented of your impudence, and the authoritarian culture here only responds to criticism of a proper (read: flattering) tone. I suppose it's kin…
-
comment
Comment #8003703
> That conversation didn't require abusiveness to be created. How can you say that with any certainty? The only real example you have of this kind of conversation happened right he…
-
comment
Comment #7275261
>If you see the Valley as another Wall Street-- with a similar corporate ladder (engineer -> VP/Eng -> CTO -> founder -> investor)-- it will piss you off less. As someone heavily i…
-
comment
Comment #7271666
Value cannot be adequately quantified. At its best, money is an inadequate substitute for such a quantification that is often useful; at its worst, the failure to be mindful of tha…
-
comment
Comment #7271638
I don't expect different, but pointing out that the technology sector is no less rotten than the financial sector is a pastime of mine.
-
comment
Comment #7271610
Oh, I can't resist. >You disdain the love of wanting money? At what point has my absolute contempt for "loving money and wanting more of it" been unclear to you? Because you really…
-
comment
Comment #7271367
In other words, you don't want money, but you are forced to deal with it.
-
comment
Comment #7271333
I'm not specifying an amount or a correctness, and I do not disagree that there is a line between means and end. I'm saying that HN's attention span is dominated by dollar signs.
-
comment
Comment #7271298
>And yes, when you call something "vulgar and utterly clueless", you're definitely making moral judgments. I know! My point is merely that I wasn't lecturing. >You have enough cons…
-
comment
Comment #7270843
>please stop lecturing people with cheap and meaningless moral judgments. Ha. I'm not lecturing; I simply have no respect or consideration for your position. You are not being lect…
-
comment
Comment #7270777
This seems to me to be an excellent example of the kind of poor thinking money promotes; do prove me wrong. >If a lot of smart people thought WhatsApp was worth 14B Why are they sm…
-
comment
Comment #7269991
There's paying the bills, and there's lust for percentages of 16 billion dollars.
-
comment
Comment #7269920
Forgive me if I'm contemptuous of those whose subjective goal is the acquisition of money.
-
comment
Comment #7269814
>Is it really vulgar to desire money and take it as indicator of success Yes? It is not only vulgar, it is utterly clueless.
-
comment
Comment #7269659
This article is from March 2012. It has been posted twice before to HN to little impact. http://hn.algolia.com/#!/story/forever/prefix/0/Whatsapp%20s... (Correction: the presentati…
-
comment
Comment #7269561
If you want evidence that HN has a fetish for money, it's that the technical details of Whatsapp's success are only closely inspected now that gratuitous cash has been thrown aroun…
-
comment
Comment #7257123
It seems to me this doesn't actually contradict parent; it almost just rephrases quanticle succinctly. (To the extent that I'm actually unsure of your intent.)
- comment
-
comment
Comment #7256879
What's amusing is that the correct title of the piece (no plural on 'overflow') is more ambiguous. I wonder which way the HN title mods will rule.
-
comment
Comment #7247043
Why are you asking me? Goodnight.
-
comment
Comment #7247015
I never said I was proud that I could tell your comment was self-aggrandizing. I only said it was obvious.
-
comment
Comment #7246951
Heh. Well, you've made it pretty easy for me. >>Under the circumstances, it's time for you to get over yourself. The OP's post, and my reply, are perfectly symmetrical -- one deman…
-
comment
Comment #7246539
Oh, get over yourselves, both of you. He's just starting a conversation, and while I wouldn't advocate handing out participation ribbons, you're just trashing someone that had a th…
-
comment
Comment #7189109
There's trying to cross trends for other people (your example) and trying to cross trends in order to find your own niche within expectations. Witness all of the not-quite-fits in …