Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Hedepig

Hedepig

HN member
Joined
Sun, Nov 22, 2020, 7:17 AM UTC
HN karma
143
Public activity
126 items

About Hedepig

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46131558

    ... and Oracle lost

  2. comment
    Comment #45963981

    Except on HN HAHA! Our servers are still down, though

  3. comment
    Comment #42653298

    I mean, this could be phase 2 of career growth. Focus on personal growth first by surrounding by experts.

  4. comment
    Comment #42221174

    The static nature of LLMs is a compelling argument against the reasoning ability. But, it can learn, albeit in a limited way, using the context. Though to my knowledge that doesn't…

  5. comment
    Comment #42220377

    I do see your point, and it is a good point. My observation is that the models are better at evaluating than they are generating, this is the technique used in the o1 models. They …

  6. comment
    Comment #42219675

    If we do figure out how to vet these thoughts, would you call it reasoning?

  7. comment
    Comment #42216102

    > then it is a correct formula to say 'it's not "true reasoning"' why is that point fundamental?

  8. comment
    Comment #42212022

    This is not totally my experience, I've debated a successful engineer who by all accounts has good reasoning skills, but he will absolutely double down on unreasonable ideas he's m…

  9. comment
    Comment #42170634

    I read the original comment as hyperbole. But can see why it was confusing. Edit: that came out way more condescending than I intentended

  10. comment
    Comment #41980270

    Have you had a go with the o1 range of models?

  11. comment
    Comment #39763669

    I think you're right The danger is two fold 1. People don't eat fatty foods which have solid evidence for their benefits (e.g. Virgin olive oil) 2. People substitute the lack of fa…

  12. comment
    Comment #39272746

    Argh, what has Black Mirror done to our sense of optimism? (I agree with you).

  13. comment
    Comment #38847896

    I mentioned in another comment, I enjoyed the structure and found it much easier to process. This is despite mostly reading long form articles and never having been a huge twitter …

  14. comment
    Comment #38847876

    On the contrary, I have never been a heavy twitter user, yet I would dearly love all articles I read to be broken down like this. I definitely find it easier to process a list stru…

  15. comment
  16. comment
    Comment #38541116

    > tends to give subjectively better responses to "bad prompts". I wonder if a first pass with another model to expand these so called bad prompts into better prompts would work.

  17. comment
    Comment #38476515

    Thank you for this :)

  18. comment
    Comment #38465815

    I am currently tinkering with this all, you can download a 3b parameter model and run it on your phone. Of course it isn't that great, but I had a 3b param model[1] on my potato co…

  19. comment
    Comment #38331437

    At the risk of sounding a bit dumb, I shorted my motherboard with a USB A, it felt like I got it right, and pushed it in, at which point it shutdown. Fortunately there didn't seem …

  20. comment
    Comment #38166832

    Does it not provide some protection against a buffer overflow?

  21. comment
    Comment #38164140

    Yes it would be prevented by the borrow checker.

  22. comment
    Comment #38149989

    If it's some consolation, I've just listened to a recent podcast on This Week in Virology (as recommended by another comment on this post. And they are talking about research that …

  23. comment
    Comment #38149974

    > they're usually not considered "alive" in the same way cells are Still, it's up for debate whether they are alive, regardless whether it's the same way that cells are alive

  24. comment
    Comment #38141137

    That page mentions the potential for weaponisation with a 100% fatality rate. Well thank you very much for another thing to keep me awake at night.

  25. comment
    Comment #38135673

    From another comment, looks like at least 8 years. Sorry!