Viewing profile — HarfTarf
HarfTarf
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 09, 2016, 11:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 62
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About HarfTarf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16652749
I just signed up on your site, looking for kubernetes and Linux work.
-
comment
Comment #16452734
You could build an application on top of ipfs as an encrypted store, and use ssb to broadcast your messages to other nodes.
-
comment
Comment #16318330
Here's a Google translation: https://i.imgur.com/TWZLwVY.png
-
comment
Comment #16012905
Yes, it bothered me. I only skimmed the article looking for how it got its name, but the article never answers the question. How frustrating...
-
comment
Comment #16004022
My only feedback is "thanks!"
-
comment
Comment #15901593
As an American that has gone through the process, I can confirm that there is a lot of irrelevant junk crammed down our throats and poured into our ears.
-
comment
Comment #15881917
In that sense, I would agree, ipfs can provide access to content that would otherwise be blocked.
-
comment
Comment #15881278
make no mistake: ipfs _by_itself_ is no more "anonymous" than torrenting or other types of file sharing ftp/sftp/ssh/http/whatever... because they can always get your ip address. Y…
-
comment
Comment #15804905
He's stuck inside
-
comment
Comment #15404547
I too would pay for a "supporter badge".
-
comment
Comment #15370178
https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/
-
comment
Comment #15370176
https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/ It would be nice to add your gateway to the list.
-
comment
Comment #12737677
I read it once, and was immediately duped.
-
comment
Comment #12637493
You must hear lots of things that scream.
-
comment
Comment #12349025
If you are trying to achieve encryption, then no, you will not need https, as cjdns is encrypted at every packet be nature. If you are trying to comply to some other https related …
-
comment
Comment #12259213
Any physical link can support cjdns; ethernet, 2.4ghz, 5ghz.
-
comment
Comment #12258502
I've never heard of netsukuku until now, but from a quick glance, they are very similar except that cjdns has a much higher usage in the wild and doesnt have an answer to dns.
-
comment
Comment #12258390
This is ingenious, your public address is also your public key, and the payload of the packet can only be decrypted by your private key. So awesome, it has encryption built in.