Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — HarfTarf

HarfTarf

HN member
Joined
Tue, Aug 09, 2016, 11:27 PM UTC
HN karma
62
Public activity
18 items

About HarfTarf

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #16652749

    I just signed up on your site, looking for kubernetes and Linux work.

  2. comment
    Comment #16452734

    You could build an application on top of ipfs as an encrypted store, and use ssb to broadcast your messages to other nodes.

  3. comment
    Comment #16318330

    Here's a Google translation: https://i.imgur.com/TWZLwVY.png

  4. comment
    Comment #16012905

    Yes, it bothered me. I only skimmed the article looking for how it got its name, but the article never answers the question. How frustrating...

  5. comment
    Comment #16004022

    My only feedback is "thanks!"

  6. comment
    Comment #15901593

    As an American that has gone through the process, I can confirm that there is a lot of irrelevant junk crammed down our throats and poured into our ears.

  7. comment
    Comment #15881917

    In that sense, I would agree, ipfs can provide access to content that would otherwise be blocked.

  8. comment
    Comment #15881278

    make no mistake: ipfs _by_itself_ is no more "anonymous" than torrenting or other types of file sharing ftp/sftp/ssh/http/whatever... because they can always get your ip address. Y…

  9. comment
    Comment #15804905

    He's stuck inside

  10. comment
    Comment #15404547

    I too would pay for a "supporter badge".

  11. comment
    Comment #15370178

    https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/

  12. comment
    Comment #15370176

    https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/ It would be nice to add your gateway to the list.

  13. comment
    Comment #12737677

    I read it once, and was immediately duped.

  14. comment
    Comment #12637493

    You must hear lots of things that scream.

  15. comment
    Comment #12349025

    If you are trying to achieve encryption, then no, you will not need https, as cjdns is encrypted at every packet be nature. If you are trying to comply to some other https related …

  16. comment
    Comment #12259213

    Any physical link can support cjdns; ethernet, 2.4ghz, 5ghz.

  17. comment
    Comment #12258502

    I've never heard of netsukuku until now, but from a quick glance, they are very similar except that cjdns has a much higher usage in the wild and doesnt have an answer to dns.

  18. comment
    Comment #12258390

    This is ingenious, your public address is also your public key, and the payload of the packet can only be decrypted by your private key. So awesome, it has encryption built in.