Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — HBKXNCUO

HBKXNCUO

HN member
Joined
Wed, May 08, 2019, 12:25 AM UTC
HN karma
-14
Public activity
200 items

About HBKXNCUO

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #22879655

    That may have reduced the likelihood, but closing them down would not prevent incidents from showing up in this list. For instance, check https://www.schoolsecurity.org/trends/viol…

  3. comment
    Comment #22838639

    >At the end of the day, we all want food, shelter, safety, and some amount of personal privacy and freedom. That may be the case, but different policies and social norms will resul…

  4. comment
    Comment #22837661

    >My limited but non-zero experience in real-world situations has shown that "Angry Mobs" are far more likely to be armed than "Peaceful people" And my point is that it doesn't real…

  5. comment
    Comment #22837118

    There is a fundamental asymmetry. Attackers only have to fight battles that they judge to be worth fighting. If they don't think their chances are good enough, whether because they…

  6. comment
    Comment #22834769

    Or you could compare them to the partisans that conducted sabotage against the Wehrmacht in Eastern Europe, for instance. The military would grind to a halt without a functioning s…

  7. comment
    Comment #22834536

    Is Singapore's political system suffering from decades of being torn apart by identity politics and being dominated by a small class of people that detests the people that constitu…

  8. comment
    Comment #22833539

    It doesn't really work both ways. Angry mobs looking for food don't need guns to cause problems for peaceful people. Peaceful people do need guns to protect themselves from angry m…

  9. comment
    Comment #22796354

    I don't think you could have gotten that less straight. What is convenient is that many definitions exist, so a convenient one can be chosen based on its suitability for making a p…

  10. comment
    Comment #22796266

    >Quite a few Convenient. Where do they suggest a rigorous definition of a support group in that article?

  11. comment
    Comment #22795837

    >The idea is that women have less access to various support networks that men do Source? Is there a rigorous definition of a support network, and some statistics showing that women…

  12. comment
    Comment #22769205

    >it's strong evidence that we shouldn't be uniquely concerned over negative portrayals of trademarks. Again I'm not sure how it's evidence of that, but I agree that we should not b…

  13. comment
    Comment #22764654

    The plaintiff would have to show that they lost revenue as a result of the false statements, which I would think would be particularly difficult to do in that case, because portray…

  14. comment
    Comment #22764520

    >The fact that we don't ban deceptively positive depictions of branded products is strong evidence that we do trust consumers to know the difference between fiction and reality. I …

  15. comment
    Comment #22764473

    >We still allow people to publicly criticize products. Yes, but you're not allowed to harm people or businesses by knowingly making false statements about the product in your criti…

  16. comment
    Comment #22695800

    Imagine taking someone in that position at their word.

  17. comment
    Comment #22466819

    It looks like even putting it nicely did not save tasogare's comment from our most brave and wonderful moderator. Many of mine were also flagged, despite me being extremely polite.…

  18. comment
    Comment #22443444

    >The big issue with your reasoning: racism isn't an opinion, it's a crime. Some manifestations of it are in some jurisdictions. How is that an issue with my reasoning? >You're talk…

  19. comment
    Comment #22443133

    It is a whole lot easier to expel immigrants than it is to expel a large chunk of the native population, but yes you are correct. Everything I have said applies equally well to imm…

  20. comment
    Comment #22437544

    Perhaps you should consider that it does make sense, and you simply don't want to understand it. I don't think you're intellectually incapable of understanding it.

  21. comment
    Comment #22436326

    >It's a really fundamental tradition of french society, going back to the revolution (or even before) that you can think how you like. That doesn't mean you have to want people who…

  22. comment
    Comment #22434262

    >See I actually think that it's a good thing to call for, say , "stamp out racism". Does stamping out racism to you involve preventing people from freely and equally participating …

  23. comment
    Comment #22428215

    The way people in a society think influences the character of that society, obviously. Do you disagree with that? If people in some society like the way their society is, more or l…

  24. comment
    Comment #22427852

    [flagged]

  25. comment
    Comment #22426674

    No matter where you were in the developed world, the majority in 1932 (though not necessarily the majority of the elites) would have held similar views or views that were even furt…