Viewing profile — HBKXNCUO
HBKXNCUO
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 08, 2019, 12:25 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -14
- Public activity
- 200 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About HBKXNCUO
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #22879655
That may have reduced the likelihood, but closing them down would not prevent incidents from showing up in this list. For instance, check https://www.schoolsecurity.org/trends/viol…
-
comment
Comment #22838639
>At the end of the day, we all want food, shelter, safety, and some amount of personal privacy and freedom. That may be the case, but different policies and social norms will resul…
-
comment
Comment #22837661
>My limited but non-zero experience in real-world situations has shown that "Angry Mobs" are far more likely to be armed than "Peaceful people" And my point is that it doesn't real…
-
comment
Comment #22837118
There is a fundamental asymmetry. Attackers only have to fight battles that they judge to be worth fighting. If they don't think their chances are good enough, whether because they…
-
comment
Comment #22834769
Or you could compare them to the partisans that conducted sabotage against the Wehrmacht in Eastern Europe, for instance. The military would grind to a halt without a functioning s…
-
comment
Comment #22834536
Is Singapore's political system suffering from decades of being torn apart by identity politics and being dominated by a small class of people that detests the people that constitu…
-
comment
Comment #22833539
It doesn't really work both ways. Angry mobs looking for food don't need guns to cause problems for peaceful people. Peaceful people do need guns to protect themselves from angry m…
-
comment
Comment #22796354
I don't think you could have gotten that less straight. What is convenient is that many definitions exist, so a convenient one can be chosen based on its suitability for making a p…
-
comment
Comment #22796266
>Quite a few Convenient. Where do they suggest a rigorous definition of a support group in that article?
-
comment
Comment #22795837
>The idea is that women have less access to various support networks that men do Source? Is there a rigorous definition of a support network, and some statistics showing that women…
-
comment
Comment #22769205
>it's strong evidence that we shouldn't be uniquely concerned over negative portrayals of trademarks. Again I'm not sure how it's evidence of that, but I agree that we should not b…
-
comment
Comment #22764654
The plaintiff would have to show that they lost revenue as a result of the false statements, which I would think would be particularly difficult to do in that case, because portray…
-
comment
Comment #22764520
>The fact that we don't ban deceptively positive depictions of branded products is strong evidence that we do trust consumers to know the difference between fiction and reality. I …
-
comment
Comment #22764473
>We still allow people to publicly criticize products. Yes, but you're not allowed to harm people or businesses by knowingly making false statements about the product in your criti…
-
comment
Comment #22695800
Imagine taking someone in that position at their word.
-
comment
Comment #22466819
It looks like even putting it nicely did not save tasogare's comment from our most brave and wonderful moderator. Many of mine were also flagged, despite me being extremely polite.…
-
comment
Comment #22443444
>The big issue with your reasoning: racism isn't an opinion, it's a crime. Some manifestations of it are in some jurisdictions. How is that an issue with my reasoning? >You're talk…
-
comment
Comment #22443133
It is a whole lot easier to expel immigrants than it is to expel a large chunk of the native population, but yes you are correct. Everything I have said applies equally well to imm…
-
comment
Comment #22437544
Perhaps you should consider that it does make sense, and you simply don't want to understand it. I don't think you're intellectually incapable of understanding it.
-
comment
Comment #22436326
>It's a really fundamental tradition of french society, going back to the revolution (or even before) that you can think how you like. That doesn't mean you have to want people who…
-
comment
Comment #22434262
>See I actually think that it's a good thing to call for, say , "stamp out racism". Does stamping out racism to you involve preventing people from freely and equally participating …
-
comment
Comment #22428215
The way people in a society think influences the character of that society, obviously. Do you disagree with that? If people in some society like the way their society is, more or l…
-
comment
Comment #22427852
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #22426674
No matter where you were in the developed world, the majority in 1932 (though not necessarily the majority of the elites) would have held similar views or views that were even furt…