Viewing profile — Guillaume86

Just took a glance so I may be completely wrong, fell free to ignore, but if I understand correctly, tsrx is just syntactic sugar for normal tsx code and does not enable anything n…

Just prompt it that way then, I can get Claude to plow through features for 12h with the correct prompt and setup, no need to destroy the tools that are useful when you want the op…

Just prompt it to not ask you questions then, the point of the ask user tool is to collect human input...

OrioleDB seems interesting, not sure it's what you're after but worth a look.

Great way to launder illegally obtained data too.

The EU could/should probably legislate against this, it's bonkers...

3. If your device run on battery, why not using a relatively cheap network call in place of a very power hungry local inference call?

Yes I'm also using it for coding: I often make the agent use WebSearch in the research phase when deciding on a stack or a library or research best/modern practices to do achieve s…

You seem to have tried a few things, if you don't mind I have a few questions as someone currently on Claude Code but would prefer to not lock myself in a commercial ecosystem (and…

Tangential question for Claude Code subscribers, mid June `claude -p` will move to api pricing (with some "SDK credits" before it kicks in), so headless usage will become 20-30 tim…

I suppose folks here already know this but it deserves a mention: subscription pricing is 10-20x cheaper than API pricing at Anthropic for example and it will be a far better exper…

I think we should separate the private AI discussion from the local AI discussion. The pragmatic choice to run big LLMs is one/several big servers online, but that doesn't mean pri…

Sorry yeah it was a big vague, I was thinking about creating a Libretto MCP since it's a/the standard way to share AI tooling nowadays and that would make it usable in more context…

Did you consider MCP sampling to avoid requiring your own LLM access? (for the clients that support it of course, but I think it's important and will become standard anyway)

I think sometimes about this, does it really make sense? Financially I mean. The is just my impressions and I'm glad to be corrected if someone has hard numbers and some experience…

Yeah this should be a citation in the sanewashing wikipedia article.

Yes it's even more effective this way IMO, we will probably see some 11/10 mental gymnastics from people condemning this and failing to apply the same standards to billions dollars…

Yeah it's just a slightly more honest and simplified presentation of what LLMs providers do IMO.

Eh I think part of the joke is that LLMs have gobbled up the original source code, and if you help them enough (identical type signatures and specs), they will output the same code…

Yeah it’s funny this little mishap gets traction here in the age of commercial LLMs and generative AI... Bashing microsoft never gets old I guess

Yeah it’s hilarious seeing people lose their shit over this and not like, every commercial LLM vendor...

He said he know about it and your conclusion is that he doesnt know about the other ones...

I remember writing a parser for some SL instructions following an HN thread, seems like it was 13 years ago -_- : https://github.com/guillaume86/SolLewitt

Don't need to be a nerd, 5 secs google search: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rates-road-incident...

Well that explains it then, don't offer stupid salaries before you make stupid money...