Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — GeneticGenesis

GeneticGenesis

HN member
Joined
Thu, Nov 19, 2015, 10:31 PM UTC
HN karma
782
Public activity
73 items

About GeneticGenesis

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49241801

    Yep, spot on - this and some level of inbound filtering are the only reason we use an external platform. That said, with the volume of inbound reports coming from LLMs, the signal-…

  2. comment
    Comment #48183581

    Congrats to the team at Stainless, it's a great team to be joining over at Anthropic. We were an ealy adopter of their Node SDK generator at Mux (and latterly their Typescript and …

  3. comment
    Comment #47675475

    In the interests of transparent disclosure on such a positive blog post, It might be worth calling out that all the links on the page are all linked to the Bunny Affiliate Program.…

  4. comment
    Comment #42291142

    I know it's not public domain per-say, but for me, the thing that's most exciting is that in 2025, the last remaining patents on the h.264 (AVC) video codec will expire [1]. Now if…

  5. comment
    Comment #40147492

    Disclaimer: We're an early adopter of Stainless at Mux. I've spent more of my time than I'd like to admit managing both OpenAPi spec files [1] and fighting with openapi-generator […

  6. comment
    Comment #35040604

    A more energy efficient dishwasher would be nice though...

  7. comment
    Comment #32468103

    Super interesting, it really depends on what you mean by "choppy". Are you seeing the video re-buffer (a loading spinner re-appearing), or just the video looking stuttery? My video…

  8. comment
    Comment #29797706

    Great question! The real answer is it varies, but for H.264, most just encode on software right now, because GPUs are expensive (especially in the cloud), and the failure rates are…

  9. comment
    Comment #29797467

    Hey, I work in the Product team at Mux, and worked on the LL-HLS spec and our implementation, I own our real-time video strategy too. We do offer LL-HLS in an open beta today [1], …

  10. comment
    Comment #29794847

    We actually built How Video Works as a side project at Mux [1] (inspired by How DNS Works [2]) - there's a note about it at the top of the page. We have contributions from our own …

  11. comment
    Comment #29794481

    DRM'd video content uses the same video codecs and containers, but introduces segment encryption during the packaging phase. In most cases, this encryption is within the audio and …

  12. comment
    Comment #29794432

    While HLS isn't the cleanest protocol (Yay for extensions of the M3U playlist format...), it's actually really good at what it's designed to do - provide reliable video streaming w…

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #28049137

    Do you have a marketing site or landing page for Padka? It sounds interesting, but just linking to a .pkg file on S3 really isn't the way to educate HN users about your offering! L…

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #26591137

    So many permissions, but meanwhile autoplaying video and audio is still hidden behind a horrible heuristic model in Chrome that fundamentally prioritises internet giants like YouTu…

  17. comment
    Comment #26561370

    I work in the video streaming industry, and we continue to support TLS 1.1 extensively for a wide range of "smart" TVs and set-top boxes, very frustrating, there was even a long pe…

  18. comment
    Comment #25928354

    This was briefly interesting and then I quickly started to see blatant racism, threats and rape accusations.

  19. comment
    Comment #25745563

    I don't realistically see this as being a killer feature for most users, but it's super interesting none the less. Sony are saying the bitrate will be "Up to 80Mbps", which is arou…

  20. comment
    Comment #25592274

    This isn't accurate at all. HLML 5 video, MSE etc. have a world of improvements over the mess of FLV / Flash / RTMP streaming. Can you give some examples of what's wrong with HTML5…

  21. comment
    Comment #25374384

    Great question. There's a few approaches depending on your target latency. If you need to get below 2 seconds, yes, you'll likely want to use a WebRTC based technology to deliver t…

  22. comment
    Comment #24565754

    No worries! While some of the larger UGC platforms do use VP9 for live streaming, it is only for a limited subset of high concurrent viewer streams, and yes, in many cases those ar…

  23. comment
    Comment #24553289

    Sure, but this was my point, x264 is very fast on commodity hardware, the overwhelming amount of video delivered is still h.264, especially on live video, and in particular for low…

  24. comment
    Comment #24552713

    Great question, this is a large, complicated topic, but here's a quick overview. For context I've been building live streaming video infrastructure for a little over 10 years now. …

  25. comment
    Comment #23895939

    Great question, it's actually not quite that simple. HTML5 was indeed supposed to bring trivial video to the browser, and it almost did. If you want a good video streaming experien…