Viewing profile — Galanwe
Galanwe
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 09, 2014, 11:51 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,086
- Public activity
- 1,263 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Galanwe
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49211946
The point of PoW access is not that its hard to bypass, it's that you cannot bypass it at scale.
-
comment
Comment #49178846
> Leveraged funds are the safest way for the average investor to get access to leverage I... do not agree that leveraged funds are somehow a safest way to access leverage. Every pr…
-
comment
Comment #49132285
Its the maintenance and details that kill your NAS. You will probably rely on it for 10 years at least, so building your NAS means committing to maintaining it in the long term, yo…
-
comment
Comment #49075058
> You're conceptually wrong about "the theory" and factually about the majority of fires. Well then prove me wrong... The BDIFF publishes data of close to 30 years of wildfires rep…
-
comment
Comment #49068960
> What is indicative of escalating climate catastrophe is indeed the intensity and frequency of those firestorms I don't think we have the data that proves this theory (which of co…
-
comment
Comment #48729949
> We may have to implement some type of heartbeat where the owner of said domain has to respond within a certain amount of time. A domain squatter is in an easier position to autom…
-
comment
Comment #48524718
That's really good yes, even double tapping editing does not reset the zoom level. Definitely one of the best mobile friendly site I have seen.
-
comment
Comment #48488579
It's recursive as well, you now need to store how many levels of indirection of indices you had to resolve, which will in turn take 20TB to store, unless you store that in pi as we…
-
comment
Comment #48465919
> but I don't see many companies stepping up to provide competing services Maybe because the US dropped most of its anti trust regulations, leading to ridiculously monopolistic pra…
-
comment
Comment #48443584
> Like that, a few companies are specialized in sucking public funds and delivering nothing. Not just public, private funds as well. Typical EU, I call that helicopter regulating: …
-
comment
Comment #48438676
It's very cool, and I can really see myself use that, but not in that form of deliverable. See the best place I learn and read through materials is when I'm commuting. Far away fro…
-
comment
Comment #48414086
I have a vibe coded script which creates a git worktree + zellij pane with a specific layout + a virtualenv per feature. "tmuxinator" style. The zellij layout includes panes for Op…
-
comment
Comment #48395389
I think the logical follow up will be for Uber to lay off a bunch of people so that the remaining ones can token maxx. To the mooooon!
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48366161
> Textmate (and its revolutionary text-snippets) were the catalyst to my migration Hooo damn TextMate snippets, that brings back memories. Hard to convey how hyped I was to use the…
-
comment
Comment #48328826
That depends if you trade cash or synthetic. I think most people trade synthetic, just because it's faster and you don't have to wait for settlements, but maybe that is different i…
-
comment
Comment #48328618
"Tech stocks are growth stocks", that's pretty much how the market sees them anyway. So essentially, they are not expected to be boring businesses yielding stable dividends to inve…
-
comment
Comment #48328431
Absolutely not. For RSUs companies do not purchase at exercise date, they issue new shares (or use previous buybacks). And for stock options, the employee pays the strike, so it's …
-
comment
Comment #48328390
> Facebook doesn't get the money when you buy a share of META Technically no, but in reality yes, because shares are used as currency. For instance, META does not acquire companies…
-
comment
Comment #48327887
> You are not entering a contract with a long put Yes you are, and options are complicated . Actually, the mere fact that you think they are "simple insurance" is enough proof to m…
-
comment
Comment #48327735
I thought about that a lot too, and in the end I think it just comes down to stupid economics: What do you want them to do with all this money? 1) Most top US tech companies are fl…
-
comment
Comment #48327100
> also don't control the ETF basket The ETF is this case follows the index, so there's really no surprise. > I would still probably go with the long put strategy Just, don't. There…
-
comment
Comment #48326711
What are you talking about? You don't need to touch anything about your ETF. You just have to short a single name on the side. Also there is no liquidity issue, we're talking SP500…
-
comment
Comment #48326670
It's not just a short, it's a portfolio of X short + X long. It's effectively canceling perfectly.
-
comment
Comment #48326374
> I'd love is some sort of trade that would eliminate my exposure to SpaceX You can just short SpaceX of an amount equivalent to its share of your SP500 holdings. You will have to …