Viewing profile — FwarkALark
FwarkALark
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 27, 2024, 4:30 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 2
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About FwarkALark
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39187398
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #39187098
Why is this exposed to the user? If it isn't exposed to the user, what on earth are you talking about?
-
comment
Comment #39187085
Again, I don't see how a private industry per se could even possibly be worse given the demand for a profit margin. Your beef is with some other aspect of this process.
-
comment
Comment #39187074
I mean, all industries? The profit margin guarantees this. Anyone who has worked in private industry will verify its utter incompetence in the long term.
-
comment
Comment #39187056
Again, this can't be worse than private industry—that profit margin will guarantee this. I guarantee there is some other disease to blame for the waste—probably politicians of some…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39186604
Is this something where a public competitor might help? It surely can't be worse than private industry.
-
comment
Comment #39186479
> At what point should an acquisition be allowed on the sake of something being able to continue to exist and possibly save jobs? Never? The entire point of private companies is th…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #39186291
...for the client tooling, or for the service? The service is understandable but the tooling makes no sense whatsoever.
-
comment
Comment #39186282
> If would likely take significant research effort to even figure out a way to incorporate the new discoveries into these engines. What? Have you ever used a solver before? The act…
-
comment
Comment #39164012
> By "variable" I mean a name with a value attached. I'd just use "symbol" then. Symbols don't have much utility without a referent. > Forth doesn't let you define these within pro…
-
comment
Comment #39164011
I don't think anyone uses a stackless fortran.
-
comment
Comment #39163934
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #39163813
> In ‘stack-based languages’ the stack is, most usually, an explicit semantic construct which acts as the only available value for procedures to act on. To the extent this is true,…
-
comment
Comment #39160622
Ok sure, but FORTRAN still uses a stack in any of its relevant forms.
-
comment
Comment #39160615
> But normal order evaluation with memoization (what human computer would do - write result only once) uses graphs and graph rewriting. ...which are still most simply implemented w…
-
comment
Comment #39160609
> Conceptually, I would say other languages are variable-based. This seems less meaningful than "syntax-based" . Certainly, a "variable" is not a fundamental I deal with on a daily…
-
comment
Comment #39160602
Nothing.
-
comment
Comment #39160581
> In this case, ‘stack-based language’ is used as a term of art. This is a shitty and broken term. Hence my comment. > is a language which there’s a stack threaded through successi…
-
comment
Comment #39152779
> This seems like a great introduction to stack-based languages! Do you know of a language which is not based on stacks?
-
comment
Comment #39152775
Is there a language which is not stack-based? I imagine "concatenative" would be mildly more precise of a description. Coroutines (which often carry their own stacks) can sort-of d…
-
comment
Comment #39152744
That's wonderful! Full endorsement of the support of rsync.net. I sincerely doubt most tools will be supported by most providers (by usage), however, and I question the evaluation …
-
comment
Comment #39152592
> What cloud storage provider officially supports this tool or the protocol used by it? Man I wish I lived in a universe where providers actually supported tooling. You're complete…
-
comment
Comment #39152579
> Rclone can also mount cloud storage to local disk It's not immediately apparent what this means—does it use FUSE, 9p, a driver, or some other mechanism to convert FS calls into A…