Viewing profile — FmrAMZN_TA
FmrAMZN_TA
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 19, 2015, 4:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 66
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About FmrAMZN_TA
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18940777
Citation(s) needed. They specifically work (publicly and privately) to undermine local taxes, enforce non-competes/NDAs, capital gains, income taxes, etc. Then they do small invest…
-
comment
Comment #14608551
You are correct. They ABSOLUTELY monitor customer spend usage, without using one iota of personally identifiable information.
-
comment
Comment #14608533
You can't (and they don't promise) encryption such that AWS can't see everything, if they were in fact malicious. This is true of every cloud. That said, it's not illegal for them …
-
comment
Comment #14344965
So, then your answer is never deprecate?
-
comment
Comment #14344753
Ever? What if they had a 10 year deprecation policy?
-
comment
Comment #14344648
I think this is disingenuous. AWS keeps something running forever, that's true, but in what state? https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=121711 (We were well aware of …
-
comment
Comment #11727031
And a huge ad business they support. Oh, they didn't tell you about that?
-
comment
Comment #11727028
Amazon makes $3B a year selling ads. You think they're just guessing about personal information? Please. They lay cookies everywhere (including off site) to target you properly.
-
comment
Comment #11727018
It's funny you say the second paragraph - it feels like it directly contrasts the first (OK Google was first by a good margin).
-
comment
Comment #11583362
I'm a highly biased former Amazonian. I was expecting some real wisdom in this story, but I don't think this qualifies him as a technical leader in any way. I don't even think this…
-
comment
Comment #11583313
You get it.
-
comment
Comment #11542806
You did not say roles were increasing at 50% per year as an example - that was your stated fact. I'm saying unless they had 10 employees in 2000 (wrong) or only started the 50% hir…
-
comment
Comment #11539614
Microsoft, Google (Seattle), Century Link, Group On, Moz, Redfin, Porch, Chef, White Pages... to name a few. It's almost impossible to throw a dart at this list and not hit at leas…
-
comment
Comment #11539606
To be clear (I realize it may have seemed worse than it was): Day 1: 1000 employees Day 365: 500 employees Day 730: 200 employees.
-
comment
Comment #11539600
> Your comment on "retention" is factually incorrect. I disagree. > First the number of Amazon hires in "tech roles" increases by ~50% per year. i.e., in year 1 there are 1,000 SDE…
-
comment
Comment #11538577
We'll agree to disagree. Tension is good, when that's all it's used for. When it is specifically used to tear people down (either with a purpose, or just for vindictiveness), I thi…
-
comment
Comment #11538558
I admit, I lied in the previous comment. In the previous comment, I was worried that people would know who I was if I had said where I worked (what groups and how long). The truth …
-
comment
Comment #11536547
I disagree. There are many leadership principles which are contradictory either in part or in whole (e.g. Dive Deep vs. Bias for Action; Insist on the Highest Standards vs. Invent …
-
comment
Comment #11536245
Absolutely, if you stayed, the numbers definitely add up to what you see here. However, because the attrition was so high, you were not likely to stick around to get a bonus to mak…
-
comment
Comment #11536236
When I was there, managers were guided to PIP (performance improvement plan) to make these numbers. Whether that meant grinding people into the ground, natural attrition, or making…
-
comment
Comment #11535897
I'm a former Amazonian. Since you asked my opinion, I'll give it. It's a truly horrible place to work and I would never ask my worst enemy to go work there. Engenders the worst in …
-
comment
Comment #11535867
I won't go on about the work quality at Amazon, there are plenty of other places to read about that. It _is_ important to note that the average retention at Amazon (even for excell…
-
comment
Comment #11023906
I have an etiquette question. We're allowed to put positive comments on jobs listed here, why are we not allowed to critique jobs on here?
-
comment
Comment #10413966
Disclaimer: I am a former Amazon employee. I worked there for exactly a year. I assume I was doing well, I was offered increase bonus and base after my initial year. This response …