Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Flocular

Flocular

HN member
Joined
Thu, Oct 29, 2020, 6:12 PM UTC
HN karma
137
Public activity
53 items

About Flocular

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #34699906

    For cryptography it uses the ring-library which still relies on C-Code in many places. Additionally there is no API-stability (still v0.*) and the last official audit was 3 years a…

  3. comment
    Comment #34695959

    openSSL 1.1.1 is EOL 2023-09-11 which is likely to be the bigger problem for random-distro-XYZ

  4. comment
    Comment #34593181

    Why put the commit message there then? You could just use a git-client that adds this text as description for commits. There is generally little use to store automatically generate…

  5. comment
    Comment #33471952

    Attack complexity High (chance for an attacker to get anything at all is very low), Availability None (you're not crashing any service that's running in the background) and Confide…

  6. comment
    Comment #33466949

    Come on :D CVSS of 7.1, Complexity Low, Availability and Confidentiality High. sure...

  7. comment
    Comment #33397923

    This made me look up jpeg2000 support. And then that made me sad :D

  8. comment
    Comment #32779142

    Mentioning Greenland ice sheet in this context is always a bit of a red herring. It is important to note that in the language of these simulations no "overshoot" is included in the…

  9. comment
    Comment #32300976

    No, the original plot was in MWh. But even for LCOE wikipedia (citing lazard) shows the same 3xfactor between solar/wind and nuclear: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_o…

  10. comment
    Comment #32299984

    Democracy dies in darkness.

  11. comment
    Comment #32299959

    "when there's clouds and the wind doesn't blow, what happens?" Meteorologically speaking that won't happen over a large enough area like Europe or USA. When there's clouds there's …

  12. comment
    Comment #32299925

    That is just to show that nuclear isn't a magical always-on power source that some of the pro-nuclear folks make it out to be. Also: we can install twice the capacity in MW for sol…

  13. comment
    Comment #32299805

    A good estimate to gauge the societal investment needed to generate electricity in a certain way, is to look at its total cost in dollar/MWh. Wikipedia has a nice graphic prepared …

  14. comment
    Comment #32035839

    Sentences that apparently mark cognitive distortion: "The quality of our product is not acceptable yet.", "I won't go to this meeting, because I feel nauseous.", "Children should g…

  15. comment
    Comment #32033630

    I think this is trying to solve delivery inside cities. However, I don't see cities beeing clogged by parcel delivery services. Transportation of goods is more problematic on the i…

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #31304821

    Sadly it's missing a native TCP-reassambly. Was caught by suprise by that recently, but there's always pyshark

  18. comment
    Comment #30807342

    DFDL ("Daffodil") https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Format_Description_Langua... was made pretty much exactly for describing/parsing binary formats in a schema-like format. It is …

  19. comment
    Comment #30593326

    Got announced 2 weeks ago https://web.archive.org/web/20220225082910/http://ars.userfr...

  20. comment
    Comment #30590844

    In-place conversion of NTFS? You either still believe in a god or need to google the price of harddrives these days. Honest question tho, why would anybody do in-place conversion o…

  21. comment
    Comment #30224820

    It indeed doesn't cover data processed by "a natural person in the course of a purely personal or household activity" But arguably, as soon as you upload stuff to github.com you al…

  22. comment
    Comment #30221323

    No, GDPR applies to everyone. The government is proactively only enforcing GDPR vs organizations, private persons need to sue to get GDPR enforcement against each other. Also - sho…

  23. comment
    Comment #30221288

    You would have to ask companies that you called how they shared & used your information. You probably can't reject to the data collection as it's based on legitimate interest (frau…

  24. comment
    Comment #30168558

    that could still be considered negligent, if it has a CVE and you're using it, you gotta know about it

  25. comment
    Comment #30136752

    >>You cannot make another computer do anything. You can only send messages, and the receiver decides how to act on those. By that logic malware doesn't exist. That's the wildest we…