Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — FartyMcFarter

FartyMcFarter

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 05, 2018, 1:32 AM UTC
HN karma
5,807
Public activity
1,675 items

About FartyMcFarter

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49258440

    I don't know if borders matter much in this case. It's approximately just as easy to travel to England from many other countries as it is to travel to England from the rest of the …

  2. comment
    Comment #49243018

    > Anyone that wants to train a model needs to procure and destroy their own physical copy of each book! Why? Couldn't they resell or give away the books after scanning them?

  3. comment
    Comment #49194880

    4% drop is a nothingburger. Stocks drop more than that for overreactions to random news all the time.

  4. comment
    Comment #49194855

    I like most of that TLDR, but: > Full-stack bragging (...) is pure corporate theater. I think Google is just about as full-stack as possible when it comes to AI. They do design the…

  5. comment
    Comment #49186004

    We know he's definitely stepping. That's a start.

  6. comment
    Comment #49185968

    I think Demis has been way more influential in the past decade. Jeff and Sanjay built a lot of Google's foundational software, but that was a long time ago.

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #49184888

    What do you mean?

  9. comment
    Comment #49171793

    Even if that's the way it should be, it's not reality. You can study for the interviews you'd like to have, or the ones you'll actually have.

  10. comment
    Comment #49167761

    If you expect Leetcode-style problems in the interview and are actually interested in doing your best there, why wouldn't you prepare for that?

  11. comment
    Comment #49167155

    We're specifically talking about people who are interviewing for jobs - I'd expect a lot of them to have done leetcode before the interviews. Also: when we think about whether we'v…

  12. comment
    Comment #49166640

    Plot twist: the interviewer despises the internal culture and did this as a way to send a signal that the interviewee shouldn't work there regardless of how well the interview went…

  13. comment
    Comment #49166205

    > As a candidate myself I always mention if I have seen similar problems, such as finding primes - real example, and I was hired on that loop at Microsoft! Normally I'm completely …

  14. comment
    Comment #49154277

    > People would not understand assembly any more and blindly trust the output of the compiler. This was OK as long as you understood enough Assembly to debug it. Even though I haven…

  15. comment
    Comment #49143836

    > Problem is short of filtering out anything published after 2023 Is it even feasible to filter this? Such metadata can be easily faked too in a lot of contexts.

  16. comment
    Comment #49122599

    Great show, great reference.

  17. comment
    Comment #49112033

    Then I have to deal with whichever random person they decide to send. I can't be the only one who finds this annoying (even if I'm not in the majority).

  18. comment
    Comment #49111905

    I don't want a person I don't know very well in my space. That aside: if I'm lucky enough to find a person who's good and reliable, they might move away, switch jobs etc. It has al…

  19. comment
    Comment #49111641

    > Hell, the only ones that can afford them will be the same that would hire human household help. But maybe they'd rather deal with a robot than a human?

  20. comment
    Comment #49111550

    Another way to look at it is that they're avoiding some of the expensive parts of making products that use AI, while leaning into their strengths. No Tesla required within the expl…

  21. comment
    Comment #49111512

    These robots look slow and not very fluid in their motions, but LLMs like ChatGPT also looked very dumb initially. If progress is as fast as LLMs , this could have massive applicat…

  22. comment
    Comment #49111432

    Yes. That's a whole other level of difficulty to accomplish safely.

  23. comment
    Comment #49021677

    > they didn't plan to just spend cash without any return. No return? Annual earnings have kept increasing at 20-40% for the last 4 years. Plus there's this: https://www.theregister…

  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #49021135

    Why does it raise alarm? Pretty sure all this spending was planned.