Viewing profile — FairlyInvolved
FairlyInvolved
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 13, 2021, 2:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 43
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About FairlyInvolved
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43576946
I realise no one is infallible but do you not think Daniel Kokotajlo's integrity is now pretty well established with regard to those incentives?
-
comment
Comment #43576766
We are going to scale up GPT4 by a factor of ~10,000 and that will result in getting an accurate summary of your daily schedule?
-
comment
Comment #43576710
There's a pretty good summary of how well it has held up here, by the significance of each claim: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/u9Kr97di29CkMvjaj/evaluating...
-
comment
Comment #35867514
Outside of a few retail investors institutional buyers are no so naïve that they take a loss-making company paying out a dividend as a measure of good financial health. Long Intel …
-
comment
Comment #35867439
Writing down a merger/acquisition is probably the main scenario where this could extend to the billions. I don't have an exact list but I think you'll see differences of that order…
-
comment
Comment #33041045
I don't think debris 'going higher' isn't much of a problem. Whenever this happens the orbit is going to be more eccentric - meaning a lower periapsis, and consequentially lots of …
-
comment
Comment #32678225
I think that's just a scaling issue, fundamentally there's no reason why a model trained on video couldn't come to create coherent motion in the same way that image models can now …
-
comment
Comment #32594144
I'm not saying they are doing a good enough job, but that doesn't mean their approach isn't entirely without merit. Even ignoring the infohazard angle if they published everything …
-
comment
Comment #32594062
Nuclear warfare is much less concerning than misaligned AI. Take a look into scaling laws and alignment concerns, this is a very real challenge and existential risk not some crackp…
-
comment
Comment #32591632
I kind of get the sentiment about openness but I think it's way more nuanced than you are making out. There are very good reasons for withholding SOTA models, primarily from the in…
-
comment
Comment #32590999
I wouldn't necessarily say a major breakthrough as such but I do think some architectural change is needed. There are concepts in images that we don't rely on purely visual underst…
-
comment
Comment #31768377
And N7 is almost certainly cheaper (holistically) than Intel 7, from an economic perspective AMD have done more with less.
-
comment
Comment #31768348
They hold a monopoly of merit, many tried EUV and they succeeded in doing something that others were calling impossible even 5 years before they shipped it, not by shutting down co…
-
comment
Comment #31651563
Several people have answered this from the angle of why the cost is large, but missed the other (necessary) angle - the benefits are also massive and well understood. Plenty of pot…
-
comment
Comment #29482907
I think that's well-understood and the existence of the F-35 evidences the perceived threat from nations with more advanced militaries.
-
comment
Comment #28318281
It does if the reward is sufficiently large. If BTC mining relied on pieces of litter being collected you'd get people spending $millions on factories to produce litter and vehicle…
-
comment
Comment #28318132
I really don't see how the current hashrate is required to prevent a 51% attack, that seems way beyond what is necessary. These Proof of Waste systems aren't really a negative feed…
-
comment
Comment #28080483
They sort of have to, you can't selectively enforce trademarks like you can with other IP