Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — FL33TW00D

FL33TW00D

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jul 06, 2020, 9:27 AM UTC
HN karma
1,138
Public activity
327 items

About FL33TW00D

https://fleetwood(dot)dev/ @fleetwood___

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49135572

    Crazy how forward thinking this guy was in 2005 vs today.

  2. comment
    Comment #49043327

    I remember the Saturn V being caught by chopsticks in mid air too. Starship is fantastic value for money compared to Artemis!

  3. comment
    Comment #48555789

    Some of the talent at Cursor is second to none. E.g Less Wright, Sasha Rush, Stuart Sul. Google paid 2.5B to bring Noam back into the fold in 2024 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  4. comment
    Comment #48445885

    The guy who uncovered this, Sholto David, is basically just awesome? Watch him cycle from Wales -> China in 90 days: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdgHZPfivVA This isn't his firs…

  5. comment
    Comment #48159914

    Anyone have recommendations on books that can rival the first part of Accelerando in number of prescient ideas about how the near future, pre singularity might look? My own list is…

  6. comment
    Comment #48149895

    Hasn't fMRI as a whole been called into question? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-025-02132-9

  7. comment
    Comment #47849949

    In a country with a national health system, why should you be able to internalize the benefit of smoking whilst externalizing the cost?

  8. comment
    Comment #47358471

    Why ruin good work by letting Claude write it all? Full of em dashes, riddled with Claudisms.

  9. comment
    Comment #47220469

    Unreadable Claude slop

  10. comment
    Comment #47134199

    This was mostly down to enormous pressure from his father, causing him to have a breakdown in his early twenties. Not to say the results weren't incredible, but certainly required …

  11. comment
    Comment #46915958

    Completely false: https://x.com/i/status/2019213765506670738 Listen to the statement. The operators help when the Waymo is in a "difficult situation". Car drives itself 99% of the …

  12. comment
    Comment #46813540

    How many of these are due to going outside the normal envelope of what birds do?

  13. comment
    Comment #46813527

    It takes a different code path for efficiency. e.g if (batch_size > 1024): kernel_x else: kernel_y

  14. comment
    Comment #46807623

    But why is FSD "failing" is the key question. Hint: it's not the sensor inputs that are the bottleneck!

  15. comment
    Comment #46807306

    I like the comparison, but with aviation on a fundamental level we made it simpler (removing actuation), not added more (senses we dont need)

  16. comment
    Comment #46807177

    How can you say camera only navigation won’t work with such finality when humans manage just fine every day! You literally have an existence proof of it working.

  17. comment
    Comment #46647972

    I love this, the interday variability in my intelligence is extremely annoying.

  18. comment
    Comment #46405546

    Mr Kwok already analysed these deals and gave them a nice little acronym: HALO https://kwokchain.com/2025/07/15/the-halo-effect/

  19. comment
    Comment #46385246

    He did not "create" the TPU. He contributed to the creation of the TPU. There are 66 authors on the original TPU paper: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3079856.3080246

  20. comment
    Comment #46254705

    He went from being unable to eat many foods, to eating a full cheese pizza on camera. Pretty sure it worked.

  21. comment
    Comment #46244345

    The paternalistic state does not allow you autonomy over your own body. e.g the amount of backlash thought emporium got when he genetically engineered himself to remove lactose int…

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #45928416

    Very interesting data point

  24. comment
    Comment #45631151

    Dante and Nebula have a bad reputation. ySeq has an 8 month wait list. This guys Nanopore sequencer doesn’t work. It is quite hard to get yourself sequenced in EU in 2025.

  25. comment
    Comment #45622474

    How certain are you of this really? I'd take this bet with you. You're saying that we won't achieve AGI in ~80 years, or roughly 2100, equivalent to the time since the end WW2. To …