Viewing profile — Erunno
Erunno
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Dec 20, 2011, 10:00 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 72
- Public activity
- 42 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Erunno
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #4459494
I doubt that the patch helps in this particular case as all images are present in the DOM, so Firefox will merrily load all of the images, independent of whether they are visible o…
-
comment
Comment #4459208
No, by their own admission Firefox just sucks at displaying pages with a lot of images such as this one [1]. [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683284
- comment
-
comment
Comment #4125112
Mea culpa, I didn't want to steal the thunder from the great guys at Opera. From my end user perspective I only remember Opera supporting the tag in a version which was released al…
-
comment
Comment #4123855
I know I start sounding like a broken record for those who read my comments regularly in these kind of threads, but I always feel inclined to point out that Chrome's much-lauded ar…
-
comment
Comment #4123823
Firebug is most likely the culprit [1]. Firefox 15 will have a general fix for the kind of memory leaks such as the one caused by Firebug (affectionately called "Hueyfix" after its…
-
comment
Comment #4123232
This is probably why so many features from Mozilla end up in other browsers: -Notification bar in pretty much all browsers. -Doorhanger panels -Download pane which Safari managed t…
-
comment
Comment #4115548
Unfortunately one misbehaving extension is enough to break Firefox' memory usage. I ran a fresh profile without any extensions for a few days recently and it was a marvel: Firefox …
-
comment
Comment #4092287
Unfortunately Google's policy doesn't cause only malicious extensions to be removed from their web store. For instance, All Mangas Reader, a combined reader and management tool for…
-
comment
Comment #4073154
FWIW if you switch Firefox to small icon mode, hide the addon bar (previously status bar) and the bookmark bar, then Firefox only has a few vertical pixel less than Chrome for the …
-
comment
Comment #4073130
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 The bug is 8 years old and nobody seems to be working on it. I wouldn't hold my breath that it will be fixed soon.
-
comment
Comment #4073126
Depending on the site page loading can still badly affect interface responsiveness. There are a number of projects to alleviate this under the umbrella of the Snappy project[1] but…
-
comment
Comment #4073104
"I think it's a bit more resource-hungry than Chrome" Depends on what you measure and your usage patterns. Firefox runs circles around Chrome with regards to memory usage and featu…
-
comment
Comment #4073096
No, it has nothing to do with loyalty but with utility and how you weigh the different feature sets of each browser (speed et al. being features as well for the sake of this discus…
-
comment
Comment #4070299
Once SPDYv3 is enabled in a release channel the Chrome installations which only support an outdated SPDY version will rise suddenly if the current update trend is not reversed in a…
-
comment
Comment #4070267
SPDY is in a better position to dictate the development of HTTP 2.0 as there are already two independent implementation in the wild, unlike S+M which so far only exists as a concep…
-
comment
Comment #4070243
The problem with Chrome not having such an option is not just limited to startup time when restoring a session. Having too many open tabs causes the resource consumption to go thro…
-
comment
Comment #4070183
Apparently not. There's an ever growing tail of users who get stuck with an outdated version [1]. It's not as bad as Firefox yet but surprising nonetheless given how much effort Go…
-
comment
Comment #4054512
Why is this marked as "Chrome only"? I can't spot any errors with Firefox 13.
-
comment
Comment #4052835
Earth will easily survive humanity, even if we carpet bomb the surface with nuclear weapons. Even life is very likely to survive in its own niches as it has done during past global…
-
comment
Comment #3972486
I'll just add another data point. After the release of VLC 2.0 I was slightly dissatisfied with the new interface on OS X and used the opportunity to try out a couple of alternativ…
-
comment
Comment #3968641
1. Nature is not "smart", it is not a conscious entity. So neither can we outsmart it nor can it outsmart us. 2. I strongly dislike the dichotomy between nature and humans. Our spe…
-
comment
Comment #3968209
Humans, due to their highly evolved brains, have accumulated such a vast amount of knowledge that we can adapt our environment to suit our needs as we have been doing for the past …
-
comment
Comment #3947483
Yeah, there are probably several factors which assisted Chrome's rise to prominence. Obviously Google's huge marketing power and their bundling deals can't be disregarded easily bu…
-
comment
Comment #3945723
"You can tell if an extension is using the Jetpack API if it doesn't require a browser restart to install." Not necessarily. "Traditional" extensions can be extended to support bei…