Viewing profile — Emphere
Emphere
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 29, 2017, 5:35 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 46
- Public activity
- 35 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Emphere
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45638607
Thanks, can you point to where you found this info?
-
comment
Comment #42519704
+1. I was excited for it and it sounded nice in theory but in practice it was just too much of a slog for me. I picked it up because I have a non-traditional math background and wh…
-
comment
Comment #39697576
You may like Typora.
-
comment
Comment #36766092
Seriously? This article is obviously poorly written marketing copy and is just one step above the average InfoWars article. "Caffeine anhydrous was first developed by the Nazis" OK…
-
comment
Comment #31530186
PC has spoken admirably of Koch Industries and he thinks there's some merit to remaining private. That's probably why. I don't have the source at hand but probably one of his podca…
-
comment
Comment #30115630
I would like to second this recommendation. For a long time I thought their content was low quality edutainment because of the generally 90s website design and the generic stock ph…
-
comment
Comment #26910992
Nothing in our previous understanding suggests that they increase release of aerosols or aerosolization. Multiple previous studies have shown that they don't (see Asadi, S., Cappa,…
-
comment
Comment #26910683
Yes, but they are a pretty good proxy for psychological discomfort levels/rates. And my point was that you can't really compare acne to covid as the latter is much worse (let me em…
-
comment
Comment #26903996
Your logic is flawed because additive risks like that cannot be compared to exponential risks (like the spread of a virus). There's an asymmetry in the outcomes and the potential u…
-
comment
Comment #26899702
What are the obvious negative of face masks?
-
comment
Comment #26849040
Honestly, this is a problem with everything. Snobs are sort of a double edged sword. They are great because they are very passionate and likely spend a lot of time on the topic at …
-
comment
Comment #25353617
Nobody disagrees with holding judges accountable but from the context, what you're advocating for sounds like a blood feud and we all know how those tend to turn out.
-
comment
Comment #25353572
Would be interested in seeing a source for this if possible
-
comment
Comment #25320773
Yeah, basically this. I assume HN has a higher number of people who work in ML jobs in fields like finance etc. If you're working in any sort of social/public health research, then…
-
comment
Comment #25305271
Very good, something I have been thinking about as well. Inequality is bad because of the massive power differentials. How do you propose we "solve" that while still being able to …
-
comment
Comment #25258193
Countries that didn't enforce strict lockdowns do worse economically https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/to-save-the-...
-
comment
Comment #25258046
Why wonder? You can read in the original press release that there were ~5000 patients under the age of 65 with chronic diseases such as diabetes, severe obesity and cardiac disease…
-
comment
Comment #25112471
No, fiber does not have that big of an impact on absorption. That's why most fruits are a big no on keto diets
-
comment
Comment #25049444
Sorry but this is ridiculous. Your solution to inmates having crappy lives is to impose even more arbitrary restrictions on them? This would make sense only if they could voluntari…
-
comment
Comment #24688981
His book, "The Machinery of Life", is just wonderful.
-
comment
Comment #24556175
Why shouldn't we have great recall of the details of books we read? All of the things you describe about actively engaging with the works you read are obviously correct (taking not…
-
comment
Comment #24369357
You're absolutely right. Please disregard my entire comment.
-
comment
Comment #24369354
I...had such an epic brain fart, I don't even know what to say. Please disregard my entire comment.
-
comment
Comment #24367022
This is not a strong signal. The adjusted odds ratio is 0.03 (95% CI: 0.003 - 0.25). For randomised trials, it makes no sense to say that the difference in baseline is not signific…
-
comment
Comment #24341913
But in practice, directing animosity at advertisers and platforms is an effective way to remove content you don't like. It doesn't matter if the platform/advertisers says that they…