Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — EmbarrassedHelp

EmbarrassedHelp

HN member
Joined
Fri, Nov 14, 2025, 11:31 PM UTC
HN karma
686
Public activity
157 items

About EmbarrassedHelp

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49214299

    Despite the UK's better sex education, the country (or at least its leadership) is still disturbingly socially conservative when it comes to sex.

  2. comment
    Comment #49214239

    The New Mexico AG behind this case is Raul Torrez. He's a fascist/authoritarian asshole who has been using this case to try and force mandatory online age verification on everyone …

  3. comment
    Comment #49214221

    The problem is that "what's right for children" should be better parental controls, and better enforcement of treating self-declared ages under 18 separately. Instead, the New Mexi…

  4. comment
    Comment #49189705

    The other answer is that the people creating these ads have the resources to continuously try and bypass filters/moderation.

  5. comment
    Comment #49118585

    That's how members of the UK government refer to anyone that supports privacy and encryption

  6. comment
    Comment #49118560

    And that should be highly illegal to demand that a user submits to age verification.

  7. comment
    Comment #49118552

    The EU app is still shitty and unfixable, because it requires that you send personal information to a third party. The only acceptable and privacy respecting option is self declara…

  8. comment
    Comment #49118547

    That's a false equivalence. The only thing we should be doing is tackling addictive algorithms for everyone, and providing purely optional parental controls that are disabled by de…

  9. comment
    Comment #49118541

    That's a false equivalence and you know it.

  10. comment
    Comment #49118535

    The current version of the API seems to allow for that to be a requirement already, as part of the "ageRangeSource" field: https://developer.android.com/google/play/age-signals/und…

  11. comment
    Comment #49118524

    Signal would rather tell a government to fuck off than implement any sort of client side scanning.

  12. comment
    Comment #49118519

    Google's shitty API lets developers force you to verify your age with government ID and selfies, as part of the "ageRangeSource" field: https://developer.android.com/google/play/ag…

  13. comment
    Comment #49118510

    Their shitty API lets developers force you to verify your age with government ID and selfies, as part of the "ageRangeSource" field. https://developer.android.com/google/play/age-s…

  14. comment
    Comment #49118461

    The blog post lists regions where it is not mandatory

  15. comment
  16. comment
    Comment #49118438

    The problem is that you may wake up and find this system enabled by default unless you submit to age verification, like the authoritarian bullshit Apple pulled in the UK.

  17. comment
    Comment #49101752

    Right before that, they explicitly demand that age verification be 100% optional. But I wish they used stronger anti age verification language rather than trying to pay lip service…

  18. comment
    Comment #49101724

    Those are false equivalences.

  19. comment
    Comment #49078751

    > He is not advocating a ban of open-weight models He is though. He wants open weight models banned that do not pass some set of tests. And what does "safety" mean here? We constan…

  20. comment
    Comment #49041943

    If a country wants to ban private open source communication, then they do not deserve to enjoy the benefits of modern technology.

  21. comment
    Comment #49028632

    > Also, doesn't this give law enforcement an easier avenue to compel access to someone's accounts? It does.

  22. comment
    Comment #48999294

    > Now, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands must determine whether the geo-blocking used by the website was state of the art and effective in practice. If so, the intended audience…

  23. comment
    Comment #48999258

    One of the core functions of Court of Justice of the European Union (CEJU) is to perform judicial review, which means they can strike down laws. So it would not be legal to pass le…

  24. comment
    Comment #48997898

    Hopefully this ruling adds to some precedent in favour of VPNs to future court battles attacking VPNs for circumventing age verification.

  25. comment
    Comment #48997845

    A mandatory client side scanning system with an opaque database filled with unverifiable entries would render many of the protections provided by ADP meaningless. Its was insane th…