Viewing profile — EmbarrassedHelp
EmbarrassedHelp
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Nov 14, 2025, 11:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 686
- Public activity
- 157 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About EmbarrassedHelp
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49214299
Despite the UK's better sex education, the country (or at least its leadership) is still disturbingly socially conservative when it comes to sex.
-
comment
Comment #49214239
The New Mexico AG behind this case is Raul Torrez. He's a fascist/authoritarian asshole who has been using this case to try and force mandatory online age verification on everyone …
-
comment
Comment #49214221
The problem is that "what's right for children" should be better parental controls, and better enforcement of treating self-declared ages under 18 separately. Instead, the New Mexi…
-
comment
Comment #49189705
The other answer is that the people creating these ads have the resources to continuously try and bypass filters/moderation.
-
comment
Comment #49118585
That's how members of the UK government refer to anyone that supports privacy and encryption
-
comment
Comment #49118560
And that should be highly illegal to demand that a user submits to age verification.
-
comment
Comment #49118552
The EU app is still shitty and unfixable, because it requires that you send personal information to a third party. The only acceptable and privacy respecting option is self declara…
-
comment
Comment #49118547
That's a false equivalence. The only thing we should be doing is tackling addictive algorithms for everyone, and providing purely optional parental controls that are disabled by de…
-
comment
Comment #49118541
That's a false equivalence and you know it.
-
comment
Comment #49118535
The current version of the API seems to allow for that to be a requirement already, as part of the "ageRangeSource" field: https://developer.android.com/google/play/age-signals/und…
-
comment
Comment #49118524
Signal would rather tell a government to fuck off than implement any sort of client side scanning.
-
comment
Comment #49118519
Google's shitty API lets developers force you to verify your age with government ID and selfies, as part of the "ageRangeSource" field: https://developer.android.com/google/play/ag…
-
comment
Comment #49118510
Their shitty API lets developers force you to verify your age with government ID and selfies, as part of the "ageRangeSource" field. https://developer.android.com/google/play/age-s…
-
comment
Comment #49118461
The blog post lists regions where it is not mandatory
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49118438
The problem is that you may wake up and find this system enabled by default unless you submit to age verification, like the authoritarian bullshit Apple pulled in the UK.
-
comment
Comment #49101752
Right before that, they explicitly demand that age verification be 100% optional. But I wish they used stronger anti age verification language rather than trying to pay lip service…
-
comment
Comment #49101724
Those are false equivalences.
-
comment
Comment #49078751
> He is not advocating a ban of open-weight models He is though. He wants open weight models banned that do not pass some set of tests. And what does "safety" mean here? We constan…
-
comment
Comment #49041943
If a country wants to ban private open source communication, then they do not deserve to enjoy the benefits of modern technology.
-
comment
Comment #49028632
> Also, doesn't this give law enforcement an easier avenue to compel access to someone's accounts? It does.
-
comment
Comment #48999294
> Now, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands must determine whether the geo-blocking used by the website was state of the art and effective in practice. If so, the intended audience…
-
comment
Comment #48999258
One of the core functions of Court of Justice of the European Union (CEJU) is to perform judicial review, which means they can strike down laws. So it would not be legal to pass le…
-
comment
Comment #48997898
Hopefully this ruling adds to some precedent in favour of VPNs to future court battles attacking VPNs for circumventing age verification.
-
comment
Comment #48997845
A mandatory client side scanning system with an opaque database filled with unverifiable entries would render many of the protections provided by ADP meaningless. Its was insane th…