Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ElephantsMyAnus

ElephantsMyAnus

HN member
Joined
Sat, Mar 05, 2022, 10:42 AM UTC
HN karma
2
Public activity
46 items

About ElephantsMyAnus

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30992390

    How do we know it wasn't already an antique when the ship sank?

  2. comment
    Comment #30966747

    It needs very unreasonable amount of scrolling.

  3. comment
    Comment #30964391

    Skin is vital, as you need to deage veins.

  4. comment
    Comment #30964315

    And that is why nobody wants to find the truth, that the effects are human caused, and not natural.

  5. comment
    Comment #30732231

    Yeah, it would make more sense to send several telescopes, each a bit better than the one before, but I guess it was easier to get funding for "this revolutionary telescope" than f…

  6. comment
    Comment #30683712

    It's about what kind of competence is favored by the market - it favors people who can get funding, which is not necessarily related to the ability to get the job done.

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #30669529

    No I'm not doing that, there seems to be some problem specifically there. Either the values are converted incorrectly, or not at all, effectivelly stretching about 8 fstops into th…

  9. comment
    Comment #30669172

    No that can't be what's happening. You would expect contrast to be lost, not increased, if that was the issue. 8bit sRGB can contain 11.6 f-stops of dynamic range, and it is no lon…

  10. comment
    Comment #30669037

    No. It isn't there so that you can use it when you choose to. All devices expect it to be used. When you skip it the colors will be wrong.

  11. comment
    Comment #30665541

    No, the problem is VERY OBVIOUSLY more severe than that. It's really as if the images were treated as linear, which they are not. (they use gamma correction)

  12. comment
    Comment #30664965

    The one I was replying to talked about brain processing. Whatever it is doesn't need to and shouldn't be reproduced in photography as the protograph gets processed just like everyt…

  13. comment
    Comment #30664918

    No it doesn't make sense. You should not be able to capture anything darker than 40, or brighter than 60 if you are limited to 40-60. (actually by the file format, not the sensor, …

  14. comment
    Comment #30664754

    No, that does not make any sense. That should result in 40, and everything darker resulting in 40, while 60 and everything brighter resulting in 60. But what you can see is that 40…

  15. comment
    Comment #30664643

    It is different because it is obvious that shadows are darker than in reality while highlights are much brighter than in reality. Any brain filtering would have to affect the photo…

  16. comment
    Comment #30663317

    It seems to me there must be some kind of error in color calibration of most cameras. They make shadows much darker than they are, and bright areas much brighter than they are. It'…

  17. comment
    Comment #30652573

    Different accents use different vowels, but they remain comprehensible. It's specifically those accents that also change consonants that are taken as hard to understand, such as Sc…

  18. comment
    Comment #30651994

    I get that, but it matters very little in a typical sentence. I bet you could understand almost everything with all vowels replaced with schwas.

  19. comment
    Comment #30651843

    I'm not a native speaker, but, I think it's rather the opposite. It's very inauthentic. English is a rather unusual language that the meaning is mostly carried only by consonants, …

  20. comment
    Comment #30650690

    >it would have to follow from certain first-principles, and could reason his way back to the highest level of abstraction, with immense ease. The thinking of geniuses seem to be ma…

  21. comment
    Comment #30631628

    Yes it is cherry picking. You picked the starting date to make it seem like there was a dramatic rise, while looking further shows a post war dip, and return to "normal". I argued …

  22. comment
    Comment #30614429

    But why do you need to cherry pick the data, if it's so clear cut? https://www.econlib.org/archives/2011/06/crime_statistic.htm...

  23. comment
    Comment #30611784

    I'm arguing here that your views are fuelled by wishful thinking, if not nonsense. You can't turn the world into utopia by sticking to a moral panic triggered by the civil rights m…

  24. comment
    Comment #30609226

    The problem is there is no evidence for any crime boom unless you pick the right location and the right beginning year (typically the post war years) or some such contrieved scenar…

  25. comment
    Comment #30608866

    But there is no decline.