Viewing profile — Drip33
Drip33
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 31, 2020, 9:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 135
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Drip33
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26077618
Another example of a great sub: /r/kidneystones sad face noises
-
comment
Comment #25892261
What if I own the company and it's an acceptable Terms of Service use? What if I'm unemployed? Should I still be fired?
-
comment
Comment #25885286
I have access to some marketing data and for fun, select * from mobile_location where latitude between 38.88778433380732 and 38.891917997746894 and longitude between -77.0126983065…
-
comment
Comment #25435752
I found this page useful to test how code I've written handles unusual characters.
- story
-
comment
Comment #25372733
?l?d mask with I think 9 characters using default Android OS with updates. Both phones I think were minimum Android 5.0+ because that is when they switched to Scrypt to store passw…
-
comment
Comment #25360258
Galaxy S7 - online and cracked, Galaxy S4 - offline and not cracked ~2017-2019
-
comment
Comment #25360098
My powered on phone was 0day'd by Cellibrite according to internal Law Enforcement emails in disclosure and my powered down phone was not supported at all. Edit: The cracked phone …
-
comment
Comment #25000636
If you can generate the private key to a 27 character or longer English readable Bitcoin address then you can use the same magical technology you possess to earn far more than $1 b…
-
comment
Comment #25000312
This address has no known private key https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1BitcoinEaterAddressD... Sure someone could randomly guess it but not likely. You don't need to have or…
-
comment
Comment #24729655
What I wrote about is forfeiture which doesn't include criminal penalties. Most of the American (which I am not) federal press releases I read about have a maximum $250,000 fine pe…
-
comment
Comment #24729379
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20927197 > Also forfeiture doesn't account for the fact that you may have paid capital gains tax. I feel like they really …
-
comment
Comment #24591638
Neither but yes you're right for both.
-
comment
Comment #24591002
> Is this a CFAA violation? No hashes were cracked Cracking hashes alone is not a crime or I'd be in jail.
-
comment
Comment #24522261
> I guess the "modern" browser fixes this for everyone else not using a ("modern") proxy. Only if the site owner wants it so https://hstspreload.org/
-
comment
Comment #24422770
There's a lot they can do, but then it makes it impossible to search your inbox for old emails by subject, from, to etc fields. You can reduce what an adversary sees by not includi…
-
comment
Comment #24391741
I'm assuming the computer is "locked" but online, and no users consent to logging in to run anything. Will any of these methods still work if Firewire drivers are disabled?
-
comment
Comment #24391720
I thought that wasn't possible since DDR3 or 4?
-
comment
Comment #24391571
>If you can get a dump of the computer active memory you can ultimately get the decryption keys on consumer hardware What methods are available to get a memory dump if Firewire is …
-
comment
Comment #24025435
Take it further. If you witness a car from Tesla or any other publicly traded corp spontaneously combust on the side of the road and you know it will result in massive recalls befo…
-
comment
Comment #23691272
That requires some sort of malware (or similar) installed on the device/software creating the transactions which has access to the private key to leak it via some predetermined way…
-
comment
Comment #23691024
>The fun bit is that the signer can backdoor transactions, and that part isn't something that can be verified by anybody who doesn't have the private keys. Can you explain this? Th…
-
comment
Comment #23691002
Looks still unconfirmed https://decrypt.co/32145/hackers-blackmail-exchange-with-5-m... >In short, the researchers claim that the hackers have gained access to an exchange’s funds.…
-
comment
Comment #23690699
I've never heard of someone successfully and unintentionally fat fingering a Bitcoin address typo to a valid Bitcoin address nobody owns. Fee box is a different thing, the recent $…
-
comment
Comment #23690482
Probably just twice. Bitcoin addresses are check summed so it's nearly impossible to fat finger a mistake.