Viewing profile — Dr_Jefyll
Dr_Jefyll
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Oct 05, 2011, 12:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 87
- Public activity
- 32 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Dr_Jefyll
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48036477
> I find [8086 segmentation] enormously preferable to the 65816’s bank system. The primary advantages are twofold: segment overrides may be provided to any pointer, which means tha…
-
comment
Comment #47068930
> when an ESCAPE instruction is encountered, the 8086 processor starts executing the instruction, even though it is intended for the 8087. The 8086 computes the memory address that…
-
comment
Comment #41118923
"One Bit Computing at 60 Hz" describes a one-bit design of my own that folks have repeatedly posted to HN. It's notable for NOT using the MC14500... (and for puzzling some of the r…
-
comment
Comment #35595075
Clever and interesting! But not new. FWIW, I remember repairing a PA or musical instrument amplifier in the 1990's whose power transformer featured this type of core and bobbins. I…
-
comment
Comment #34555413
Probably the second-best fun I ever had was reverse engineering a discrete-TTL processor and the firmware written for it. These were embedded in some Xerox Diablo daisy-wheel print…
-
comment
Comment #32490717
>The MC14500B has an unusual architecture, making it more of a building block than a complete microprocessor. [... It] requires multiple external chips to make it usable. Love the …
-
comment
Comment #29305986
Picking up on the "three at once" theme, the 1-bit computer I built in the 1980's has an instruction that does three things. The computer only has one instruction, so I didn't both…
-
comment
Comment #26052504
Great choice of subject matter, as usual, Ken! May I direct your attention to a one-bit machine [1] that's already something of a favorite on HN, posted for discussion in 2014 [2],…
-
comment
Comment #23813721
>this only tells us about the performance of this particular FORTH engine Yes, exactly. Whatever its other qualities may be, I suspect this particular Forth has overlooked some pre…
-
comment
Comment #23015331
Rather than buying suction cups (for which I would subsequently have had no further use), I managed very nicely by using just a couple of strips of packing tape. Each strip formed …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20569953
> it might be helpful to have an example or two Apologies. The original source code from the early 1980's is stored on a non-DOS floppy. Maybe someday I'll retrieve and publish it.…
-
comment
Comment #20569712
One of us must be drinking de-caff by mistake! :D When I use the search at the bottom it "corrects" the spelling, not even bothering to remark on what it did. Adding quotes was goo…
-
comment
Comment #20568944
>I think I would get a headache "programming" it One-bit creator here. I'm surprised by how often people make comments like this. Is it the dual jump destinations which seem so con…
-
comment
Comment #18173213
Thanks for posting, Tomte. This is a project that's been discussed on HN on the past. -- Jeff https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7616831 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1246…
-
comment
Comment #17280959
Thanks, JdeBP, for remembering the KK :-)
-
comment
Comment #16675018
I was delighted at being able to cite an independent source saying such a thing was possible! In the 2016 HN thread "Strange bug workarounds" I posted a much gnarlier problem (and …
-
comment
Comment #16672315
Glad to see confirmation of using a rubber band to fix an IBM mainframe. Been there done that, but the story is so loony I wondered if anyone would believe me. http://laughtonelect…
-
comment
Comment #16569349
Back in the day (late 1980's) there was ample motivation as I had no knowledge of or access to the 65816. Programmable logic has changed the landscape since then -- and btw I have …
-
comment
Comment #16565699
Thanks for posting, ingve (and 0x12). 0x12's HN thread [1] about my project included the following TLDR: "Guy expands 6502 to 16M address space by intercepting the databus and re-m…
-
comment
Comment #12487844
Yup. And the triple 8080's contributed a lot to the character of the thing, too.
-
comment
Comment #12485921
In the 1980's I had a client that manufactured cheques, and the typesetting was done by four or five "Wescode 1420M" systems. These technological marvels used an 8" floppy drive to…
-
comment
Comment #12472186
A prior HN thread [1] about this was entitled, "The KimKlone: a radical 6502 redesign" [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3070169 The poster, 0x12, had this to summary to off…
-
comment
Comment #12472135
Thanks for your interest in my projects, 6502nerdface. You've linked to the "chatty" KK article but there's kinduva TLDR version, which folks may prefer, here [1]. In particular th…
-
comment
Comment #12271132
> autodidact != crank This. Unless you consider Charles Darwin, Oliver Heaviside, James Watt and Thomas Edison cranks. And that's just the tip of the iceberg, as you can see here: …