Viewing profile — Discombulator
Discombulator
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 14, 2017, 10:23 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 156
- Public activity
- 47 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Discombulator
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24222509
From my understanding, Taleb criticizes the native use of synthetic quantitative models with strong assumptions like VaR because they give a wrong picture of the real risks. But I …
-
comment
Comment #24218716
On the other hand, employers are also barred from colluding to keep wages artificially low, which arguably would be considered a “negotiation strategy” if one follows your interpre…
-
comment
Comment #24218630
All disciplines studying complex systems like societies down to something like the human body, simply do not have the luxury of absolute truths like in mathematics or even the abil…
-
comment
Comment #24071213
Good advice, thanks for sharing. I’d just keep in mind that there are no guarantees that kids will share our passions, even with the best approach. Humans are complex systems - it …
-
comment
Comment #24035614
I’m not doubting the facts you mention and the amount of the hypothetical subsidy might be on average in the low two digit dollar range. The overall point is however that the App S…
-
comment
Comment #24035520
My last course in competition law was a while ago, but I remember this: while there are many differences in detail between the US and the EU approach, the broad strokes are the sam…
-
comment
Comment #24030679
But when you bought it, you knew of those restrictions, right? A fully unrestricted phone might have cost more (because it is not cross subsidized by App Store profit), so it is un…
-
comment
Comment #24030641
Whatever the true cost is, the argument is spurious: Apple is not forced to provide this service at cost (or with a “reasonable” markup), they can charge in any case what they want…
-
comment
Comment #23920889
Replying to myself to correct my comment: the pension benefits funding appears to be in general - and differently from what I stated - not much different to the private sector. The…
-
comment
Comment #23915921
I am at this point not convinced that you are actually trying to understand, but if you read the text you linked, it says: > If a plan is fully funded, the minimum required contrib…
-
comment
Comment #23915791
> If you're talking about the requirement to pre-fund their pension fund, my understanding is that UPS and FedEx (and all private corporations) were already required to do so. It s…
-
comment
Comment #23880233
That is a comforting thought, but the “tough / law and order / war on drugs” response has already been tried extensively under president Calderón, and the result was an explosion i…
-
comment
Comment #23814864
What you are considering a disadvantage is seen as a strength by others (myself included): you pay only for what you use. No cross-subsidization to services you don’t need!
-
comment
Comment #23774309
While the topic is interesting, I don’t think the analysis presented in the article series (at least in the first two articles) is particularly compelling. For one, it relies much …
-
comment
Comment #23639941
Very similar story here; I barely write any Perl nowadays but am still very fond of it. I especially like the sigils - they serve in a way as a primitive type system and actually c…
-
comment
Comment #23471085
Great! Now everyone who already has an NFC U2F/WebAuthn key (e.g. YubiKey with NFC) can use it for the “advanced protection” program (which increases security on your Google accoun…
-
comment
Comment #23470603
Security is about trade offs. Talking about absolutes makes barely sense in this context, because any perfectly secure system is also perfectly useless. Despite the chosen solution…
-
comment
Comment #23450470
Without going into detail on the actual debate, I just want to make a meta point here: If you are writing an article and the following > [All] technical challenges [...] will not b…
-
comment
Comment #23384263
IANAL, but the difference is that in this case, QI came into being as a (very narrow) reading of federal law (§1983), which congress can amend easily. The Loving case was decided o…
-
comment
Comment #23330366
Nowhere, because sensible people understand that (given anonymity of participants) active moderation is necessary so low effort slogans don’t drown out interesting conversation. An…
-
comment
Comment #23300184
I do not have answers or facts to offer, but I suspect they are similar in nature to those for the question of “why haven’t we solved security critical bugs? Why haven’t we just he…
-
comment
Comment #23119641
>Everything is political! Everything. If you see something like science, religion, art, anything as apolitical, that probably means its just reinforcing prevailing politics. Let's …
-
comment
Comment #23052626
Paraphrasing the "Fundamental theorem of software engineering", Every problem can be solved with enough levels of indirection. Every level of indirection adds complexity, so the qu…
-
comment
Comment #22914645
The article focuses on an issue that is very widespread on technical forums, and one that I find irritating. (It is a bit better here thanks to the good moderation, but you can sti…
-
comment
Comment #21904802
Not familiar with the author, but good on him for admitting he was wrong. I find that most people are not able to admit their faults (without endless hedging), and those who can de…