Viewing profile — Dewie3
Dewie3
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 29, 2015, 8:38 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 184
- Public activity
- 404 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Dewie3
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #19420867
I know many conceited programmers ;)
- comment
-
comment
Comment #9712921
Thanks for the feedback. > You're projecting that the person's literary references are "name dropping things in largely irrelevant contexts". I wasn't talking about literary refere…
-
comment
Comment #9712681
It's weird to see so many of these "Go is a cleaned up/incremental step up from C" when 1) There have been plenty of natively compiled, garbage collected languages without much mor…
-
comment
Comment #9712145
> (1) where does Rust fit in this? It doesn't. Not any more than other languages anyway.
-
comment
Comment #9711937
Maybe these programming in the large languages don't necessarily have to be fantastic for programming in the large, and in the long term. But they have to be great for this at leas…
-
comment
Comment #9711783
When pron posts on a thread about lang X, it tends to be 30% about lang X and 70% raving about the JVM platform.
-
comment
Comment #9711703
> And you demonstrate (usefully, I think) the mistake of confusing complex and/or erudite speech/vocab with arrogance. There is nothing complex, hard to understand or erudite about…
-
comment
Comment #9711378
Avoiding name-dropping things in largely irrelevant contexts must be very hard. How do you even manage to be yourself?
-
comment
Comment #9711261
Ah yes, embracing your inner elitist.
-
comment
Comment #9710778
Ditto.
-
comment
Comment #9710502
That doesn't look like much of a trade-off in the context of the article, though. Namely living in civilization .
-
comment
Comment #9710496
> 2. Women are less prone to overconfidence > 3. Women are more ambitious Well okay.
-
comment
Comment #9710464
People here seem to like talking about trade-offs , specifically technical ones. Maybe intelligence is just another trade-off.
-
comment
Comment #9708598
For a second I thought someone had submitted this article with their phone and by mistake left one of those "sent from my " in as a trailing message.
-
comment
Comment #9707790
Non-standard character set aside; is the terseness (one-letter commands and such) partly because of the slow input devices at the time?
-
comment
Comment #9705148
> It's circling the wagons around people who had the privilege and opportunity to learn these things before everybody else. The underprivileged Bloomberg readership.
-
comment
Comment #9704647
Funny that the original intent for the Go creators was to not have to write C++[1] -- which of course is in the C/C++/Rust/D space -- and that Rob Pike seemed surprised that more C…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #9704484
You have some points which are to a point, and in general, true. But you present them in such a ridiculously hyperbolic way that it seems divorced from reality. Applicative is a pr…
-
comment
Comment #9704416
I think this is a bad comparison. If you're, say, reading music in order to play it, why would you need things like functions and renamings in order to read it? Just read it straig…
-
comment
Comment #9704368
That refactor is of a common pattern (I've seen it before; I've probably written it myself) into a bog-standard use of Applicative code. This use is pretty much the introductory ex…
-
comment
Comment #9703254
I thought JS was intended to be a Scheme in disguise?
-
comment
Comment #9702732
Static FP languages just feel so natural for compilers - the AST can often be perfectly naturally expressed with algebraic data types. Then you want to traverse the tree and do cer…