Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — Deprecate9151

Deprecate9151

HN member
Joined
Wed, Nov 15, 2023, 8:07 PM UTC
HN karma
199
Public activity
42 items

About Deprecate9151

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #39109881

    I want to call this out because I see this advice a lot (and it's also my backup plan). Trade work can be a fantastic way to earn a living, but it is HARD work. It will break your …

  2. comment
    Comment #39048025

    They could open the cases, but this decision hinged on the permitting process not following the law that it needed to consider emissions, which the Rights of the Chile was a compon…

  3. comment
    Comment #39047661

    It may functionally stop all new projects (although I doubt that it will get that far). I don't see anything implying that existing projects approved under the old framework would …

  4. comment
    Comment #39047406

    It does not seem so, the artcile indicates the court focused on procedural issues related to the impact assessment required for the permits to build the new oil locations. The issu…

  5. comment
    Comment #39047364

    Reading the article, none of that seems to be in scope for the decision. The decision seems to focus on the fact these new locations didn't adequately meet their existing impact an…

  6. comment
    Comment #39035288

    And reading up after this comment led to me learning some people make a distinction that latches are level triggered and flip-flops are edge triggered. I think I remember my digita…

  7. comment
    Comment #39035053

    I'm not sure if this will help since it sounds a bit different than what I experienced, but try changing the battery. Our copy had some odd behavior when it started dying, but hadn…

  8. comment
    Comment #38712683

    I think for the pharmacists its simply economics. It's cheaper to have 3 or 4 pharmacists and a bunch of much lower payed techs on staff to do the work manually then develop and ma…

  9. comment
    Comment #38657184

    I was at a company where that exec won. In this case it was the Infosphere suite to replace a fully mature Informatica/Teradata environment and fix all the "issues". Obviously the …

  10. comment
    Comment #38646818

    I used to work at a large insurance company with a COBOL core system. I completely agree with this. They paid for people who knew all the undocumented idiosyncrasies and foot-guns …

  11. comment
    Comment #38633326

    It doesn't, I'm just expanding on why a specific cell meeting the program specifications "usually" wouldn't really move the need for the FCC analysis.

  12. comment
    Comment #38633186

    That isn't a quibble, the 100/20 requirement was a key requirement they set themselves. Regardless though, I was wrong about the buildout reasoning. The FCC just doesn't believe, b…

  13. comment
    Comment #38633109

    Yeah I messed that up. After reading more the denial was focused on the fact that Starlink didn't refute they were not consistently delivering speeds and latency that matched the t…

  14. comment
    Comment #38632935

    It is difficult, but the program (theoretically, since the program isn't at that stage yet) has checkpoints to address failure to actually deliver. This stage was to focus on if th…

  15. comment
    Comment #38632468

    Can't disagree there. That is why I actually like the approach in the RDOF. It has regular progress check-ins built in, instead of the seemingly no strings attached grants given hi…

  16. comment
    Comment #38631657

    They didn't decide now. The program was created as a two step process initially. Starlink succeeded in the first round, but was denied in the second, more in depth, review that lea…

  17. comment
    Comment #38631324

    The Commission decision does address this. Unfortunately the section is redacted of specific details, but it appears Starlink argued that it's second gen satellites would be launch…

  18. comment
    Comment #38631127

    That argument is a red herring. The RDOF program is concentrated in specific geographic areas. Starlink onboarding subscribers in other areas doesn't really have a bearing on this …

  19. comment
    Comment #38630801

    For this grant the 100/20 needed to be consistently available in specific geographic areas. So if the cells bring down the performance averages are concentrated in those grant area…

  20. comment
    Comment #38630697

    That was not the terms, there were buildout requirements attached that started when the bid was accepted. https://www.usac.org/high-cost/funds/rural-digital-opportuni... Looks like…

  21. comment
    Comment #38615512

    Here's a link to the FCC attempt to preempt the law https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-order-preempting-t... And the appeals decision overturning the preemption https://law.…

  22. comment
    Comment #38607177

    It's definitely endemic, I was just commenting on a particular subset of extremism.

  23. comment
    Comment #38606990

    This letter is particularly concerning when you consider there are individuals represented by this org who also believe in the Constitutional Sheriff theory. They want to be lords …

  24. comment
    Comment #38563762

    Have you read, or at least read about, The Silmarillion? Your assumption about their trauma is very correct.

  25. comment
    Comment #38559689

    Sure, maybe there isn't, I can't argue that with my knowledge. What I am confident on is there won't be significant societal change with that level of evidence. Most of those healt…