Viewing profile — DavidPlumpton
DavidPlumpton
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 27, 2012, 10:12 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 89
- Public activity
- 46 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About DavidPlumpton
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #13142209
Make the slightest mistake and you are getting sued!
-
comment
Comment #13092169
In Many Worlds virtual particles are simply other universes (other parts of Hilbert space) that have electrons in different positions. They are nearby enough to contribute some amp…
-
comment
Comment #12997657
It does not require FTL signalling for the entanglement to work.
-
comment
Comment #12823216
Ask them about their enterprise licensing and see if you still have the same opinion.
-
comment
Comment #12775198
Death by Snoo-Snoo
-
comment
Comment #12380961
If I understand it a free particle is not really quantised; it can have pretty much any wavelength. But when it is confined by boundary conditions (e.g. within an atom) we then get…
-
comment
Comment #12380938
The Many Worlds Interpretation plus Sleeping Beauty can directly explain this.
-
comment
Comment #12284335
You don't need to hack voting machines. If you control the body that allocates them in your area you send more of them to areas favourable to your desired outcome. So in other area…
-
comment
Comment #11942884
Jeremy Clarkson published his bank account details in his column to back up his assertion that you can send money to a bank account but not withdraw any. However apparently anybody…
-
comment
Comment #11720151
In QM random outcomes occur. By what mechanism are the random values chosen? Many Worlds has a plausible mechanism for this. I'm unaware of any other interpretation claiming the sa…
-
comment
Comment #11720144
You are in A wondering why you are in A. You are also in B wondering why you are in B, and so on. It's all perfectly consistent.
-
comment
Comment #11717138
The Everett FAQ makes even stronger claims about the status of Many Worlds. See http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm#interpretation
-
comment
Comment #11044886
I wonder how that compares to a single AWS data centre.
-
comment
Comment #10315099
They used to say the Space Shuttle isn't ready to fly unless the weight of the paperwork is equal to the weight of the shuttle.
-
comment
Comment #10202677
You might find this interesting http://lesswrong.com/lw/q4/decoherence_is_falsifiable_and_te...
-
comment
Comment #10157926
Somebody should create a CV with years of experience in all the worst technologies and circulate it through all the worst recruiters and see what happens.
-
comment
Comment #10134337
The Everett FAQ Q16 disagrees. http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm And if you're in the mood for a lot of reading http://lesswrong.com/lw/r8/and_the_winner_is_manyworlds/
-
comment
Comment #9803870
The Many Worlds Interpretation explains all of this quite intuitively http://lesswrong.com/lw/r8/and_the_winner_is_manyworlds/
-
comment
Comment #9763393
Well one of those games is playing world championship level chess. Pretty cool for something that fits in your pocket.
-
comment
Comment #9635576
Is computing Chaitin's omega the most pointless waste of time that can possibly be imagined, by definition? If you actually had the value can you do anything with it at all?
-
comment
Comment #9591032
I took a university course on Unix internals in 1988. The lecturer started by announcing "this is the last year that we will teach this course as Unix is now very out of date and i…
-
comment
Comment #9392750
I was dealing with this a couple of days ago: List >>> Sigh.
-
comment
Comment #9099401
It's widely reported. For example http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2...
-
comment
Comment #9099183
So if any of this was true it would all just be an amazing coincidence that the pilot was in a courtroom seeing a political figure he strongly supported for years getting a hefty s…
-
comment
Comment #9040451
Try writing a complex program in 1960s era COBOL. Then you will understand a large part of Lisp's claim to fame.