Viewing profile — Danylon
Danylon
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 08, 2017, 8:20 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 27
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Danylon
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14162887
Using an innocuous encoding of a word is a form of encryption. People who expect to be under surveillance agree on a set of code words to denote illegal things. Though hard, there …
-
comment
Comment #14162418
Thanks for elaborating. > At some point the machine fact-checking relies on data input by humans. But so does nearly every ML model? In the case of a spell checker it is using corp…
-
comment
Comment #14162356
Resulting models will likely be released as open source, and the techniques published in open journals. The big money is in productionizing and running it on bigger datasets. Kaggl…
-
comment
Comment #14161327
1. Google has been an AI company from the very beginning (information retrieval). 2. Google is investing and doing generally useful applied AI, not an AGI moonshot. 3. Google's AI …
-
comment
Comment #14161244
Surely Google follows their own guidelines: You can't find Google Search Engine results indexed on Google itself (or any other search engine with or without ads for that matter). G…
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #14064489
> You can't reduce fact checking to an algorithm. Can you elaborate on why you think fact-checking is beyond the capability of machines?
-
comment
Comment #14056235
Cool. I knew of previous work [1], but not the recent paper you posted. Thanks. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6056 "Predicting Deeper into the Future of Semantic Segmentation"
-
comment
Comment #14054050
AI hype journalists will find something to write about, regardless of the industry making their research accessible to the wider public. Markov-chain generators have been around fo…
-
comment
Comment #14054010
http://www.parrotanalytics.com/pacific-asia-knowledge-discov...
-
comment
Comment #14053926
Beating the state-of-the-art with one-shot learning is not common. Transfer learning for NLP is also quite unchartered. Also the technique is quite novel: This is not pre-trained n…
-
comment
Comment #14036111
Reminds me of http://artcontext.net/act/06/glyphiti/docs/index.php a black and white multiplayer canvas that has been running since 2001. They also animate the progress here: http:…
-
comment
Comment #14034544
It is possible to leak information, but then you are doing it wrong. Don't use only a single out of time test set to do parameter or model selection, keep an out of time holdout se…
-
comment
Comment #14023706
Is a mistake still a mistake when it is a profitable action? If fitting to human irrationality increases generalization performance, then it does not matter if the "machines seem d…
-
comment
Comment #14023154
This implies the time machine can go only one way. Taking information from the future back in time is worth more than taking information from the current to the future. We do the l…
-
comment
Comment #14023141
Then look at backtesting. The evaluation data set is out of time, meaning the better than random performance is on unseen future data. The algorithm was implemented, not merely a s…
-
comment
Comment #14019468
> If it's so easy why not to identify directly which stocks to invest in? It is not easy. Both to set-up, and the problem itself (you won't get a very high accuracy, but you will g…
-
comment
Comment #14019286
It's not a case of exclusive or. Gather a list of a 100 or so human stock pickers. Train a model to predict the effect of following their suggestions (buy, hold, sell) to both iden…
-
comment
Comment #13823873
Bagel = Kay-gel Haggle = Kah-gl I wonder about your dialect, if for you, "bagel" rhymes with "gaggle".
-
comment
Comment #13818836
> I didn’t have any money when I started the company to purchase a domain name so I built an algorithm that iterated phonetic domain names and printed out a list of what was availa…