Viewing profile — CrossEye
CrossEye
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 24, 2013, 8:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 162
- Public activity
- 50 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About CrossEye
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #15553460
I wonder if whatever is left of Netscape can sue Microsoft now over JScript...
-
comment
Comment #13514979
And many of us have gained a great deal by having you publish on the side. Thanks, raganwald!
-
comment
Comment #9705449
Ok, that helps make it a bit more palatable to me. Thanks for the information. One question, though: How do user functions interact in here? If you didn't include `flatten`, but I …
-
comment
Comment #9703104
It's a funny world. Each of us is looking at the other library thinking there's too much magic involved. :-) Ramda is [considering a technique][1] that would significantly reduce c…
-
comment
Comment #9702166
as inglor said, this depends on strict mode: > var isboxed = (function() {"use strict"; return function isboxed() {return this instanceof Number;}}()); > isboxed.call(5); false
-
comment
Comment #9702113
That is ceratainly one of my standard examples. The best answer to this seems to be simply: var sum = ls => ls.reduce(add, 0) ISTM that this is neither as elegant nor as easy to re…
-
comment
Comment #9701018
No, in fact the real problem has been that too many incompetent people were far too certain about how to use it.
-
comment
Comment #9700563
The difference starts to show when you want to partially apply some values. // process1 :: (Item -> Bool) -> [Item] -> [OtherType] // process2 :: [Item] -> [OtherType] process1(isO…
-
comment
Comment #9700441
That's not sad. Use the tools that work for you. It was finding that those tools were no longer supporting the way I wanted to work that got me started on Ramda. I'm guessing the s…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #9700237
(Disclosure: one of the authors of Ramda here, so I may well be biased toward a very different approach.) This is an interesting approach, but I get caught right at the beginning, …
-
comment
Comment #9647944
"governments and private companies" certainly do not preclude committees. Quite to the contrary, in fact.
-
comment
Comment #9105174
Disclosure: self-submission
- story
-
comment
Comment #8876323
Yes, and those damned Italians still refuse to switch to English too!
-
comment
Comment #8876314
Very well said. I work on the Ramda ( http://ramdajs.com/ ) FP JS library with the OP. Ramda is heavily invested in currying, and I don't yet have a clue how we'll deal with defaul…
-
comment
Comment #8876251
I think the concern is simple, really. People are going to be told (rightly so) to use `let` instead of `var`. If they do so too mechanically, and their code is structured in certa…
-
comment
Comment #8656085
I've just started learning Clojure, and I haven't spent any time yet on Clojurescript.
-
comment
Comment #8654321
I've read and commented on many of these posts (the latest one far too frequently! :-) ). Excellent stuff.
-
comment
Comment #8654302
Hasn't that meme died yet? Well, I for one won't help keep it alive by pointing to the recently discovered talk video found here:....
-
comment
Comment #8654259
I apologize. I really posted it on my site only as a convenience for myself, not to be published. I never really considered anything but projection at the time. Although I can view…
-
comment
Comment #8654210
While I'm not upset that this has been posted here and has been garnering some attention, this talk wasn't designed for this kind of consumption. I have given this talk to two kind…
-
comment
Comment #8654061
That, I think, is working with the grain in Javascript. It's extremely difficult to do static checking in the language in any case, because in the language `foo.bar` is just syntac…
-
comment
Comment #8653868
The idea was just to show that, contrary to many people's expectations, OOP is not the only widely used paradigm in business programming.
-
comment
Comment #8653849
No video was recorded on the occasions I gave the talk. I'd apologize, but actually, you should probably thank me. :-)