Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — CrossEye

CrossEye

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jan 24, 2013, 8:02 PM UTC
HN karma
162
Public activity
50 items

About CrossEye

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #15553460

    I wonder if whatever is left of Netscape can sue Microsoft now over JScript...

  2. comment
    Comment #13514979

    And many of us have gained a great deal by having you publish on the side. Thanks, raganwald!

  3. comment
    Comment #9705449

    Ok, that helps make it a bit more palatable to me. Thanks for the information. One question, though: How do user functions interact in here? If you didn't include `flatten`, but I …

  4. comment
    Comment #9703104

    It's a funny world. Each of us is looking at the other library thinking there's too much magic involved. :-) Ramda is [considering a technique][1] that would significantly reduce c…

  5. comment
    Comment #9702166

    as inglor said, this depends on strict mode: > var isboxed = (function() {"use strict"; return function isboxed() {return this instanceof Number;}}()); > isboxed.call(5); false

  6. comment
    Comment #9702113

    That is ceratainly one of my standard examples. The best answer to this seems to be simply: var sum = ls => ls.reduce(add, 0) ISTM that this is neither as elegant nor as easy to re…

  7. comment
    Comment #9701018

    No, in fact the real problem has been that too many incompetent people were far too certain about how to use it.

  8. comment
    Comment #9700563

    The difference starts to show when you want to partially apply some values. // process1 :: (Item -> Bool) -> [Item] -> [OtherType] // process2 :: [Item] -> [OtherType] process1(isO…

  9. comment
    Comment #9700441

    That's not sad. Use the tools that work for you. It was finding that those tools were no longer supporting the way I wanted to work that got me started on Ramda. I'm guessing the s…

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #9700237

    (Disclosure: one of the authors of Ramda here, so I may well be biased toward a very different approach.) This is an interesting approach, but I get caught right at the beginning, …

  12. comment
    Comment #9647944

    "governments and private companies" certainly do not preclude committees. Quite to the contrary, in fact.

  13. comment
    Comment #9105174

    Disclosure: self-submission

  14. story
  15. comment
    Comment #8876323

    Yes, and those damned Italians still refuse to switch to English too!

  16. comment
    Comment #8876314

    Very well said. I work on the Ramda ( http://ramdajs.com/ ) FP JS library with the OP. Ramda is heavily invested in currying, and I don't yet have a clue how we'll deal with defaul…

  17. comment
    Comment #8876251

    I think the concern is simple, really. People are going to be told (rightly so) to use `let` instead of `var`. If they do so too mechanically, and their code is structured in certa…

  18. comment
    Comment #8656085

    I've just started learning Clojure, and I haven't spent any time yet on Clojurescript.

  19. comment
    Comment #8654321

    I've read and commented on many of these posts (the latest one far too frequently! :-) ). Excellent stuff.

  20. comment
    Comment #8654302

    Hasn't that meme died yet? Well, I for one won't help keep it alive by pointing to the recently discovered talk video found here:....

  21. comment
    Comment #8654259

    I apologize. I really posted it on my site only as a convenience for myself, not to be published. I never really considered anything but projection at the time. Although I can view…

  22. comment
    Comment #8654210

    While I'm not upset that this has been posted here and has been garnering some attention, this talk wasn't designed for this kind of consumption. I have given this talk to two kind…

  23. comment
    Comment #8654061

    That, I think, is working with the grain in Javascript. It's extremely difficult to do static checking in the language in any case, because in the language `foo.bar` is just syntac…

  24. comment
    Comment #8653868

    The idea was just to show that, contrary to many people's expectations, OOP is not the only widely used paradigm in business programming.

  25. comment
    Comment #8653849

    No video was recorded on the occasions I gave the talk. I'd apologize, but actually, you should probably thank me. :-)