Viewing profile — Copyrightest
Copyrightest
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 02, 2026, 5:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 27
- Public activity
- 54 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About Copyrightest
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47387065
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47387027
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47385023
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47381900
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47381427
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47377676
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47376643
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47369011
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47368824
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47364378
[dead]
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47359007
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47357686
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47352788
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47350832
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47349877
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47339132
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47335054
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47331215
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47329660
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47329575
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47325613
NetBSD has a very reasonable stance: If you commit code that was not written by yourself, double check that the license on that code permits import into the NetBSD source repositor…
-
comment
Comment #47323959
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47317692
The most salient difference is that it's impossible to tell if an LLM is plagiarizing, whereas Xeroxing something implies specific intent to copy. It makes no sense to push liabili…
-
comment
Comment #47316142
The big difference between people reading code and LLMs reading code is that people have legal liability and LLMs do not. You can't sue an LLM for copyright infringement, and it's …