Viewing profile — Conjoiner

Your first premise is false. Hooking up your sensory system to a device that generates the maximum signal would give a larger signal since it would bypass degradation in your mouth…

I am not aware of any claim that the devil is the largest evil that could be imagined. Further, such a definition would not make sense in for example traditional Christianity where…

it's not 51% of the nodes, it's 51% of the hashing power together with following the agreed upon rules of the network

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Navy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Navy#Equipment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Spanish_Navy_sh... https://en.wikipedia.…

we do not have a workable definition of intelligence

Surprisingly no, they were not following science.

That's africa, not the west.

Do Buddhists hold this to be true?

Growing Bureaucracy https://images.huffingtonpost.com/2015-12-08-1449597231-8924...

According to Buddhism, is there truth that a self can hold?

If it is in the publics best interest for the BBC to own the rights then that can be arranged

so those researchers can skip reading the article, the rest of us may like it

Rats have brains as well

you could try property dualism or hylomorphism or eliminative materialism

Trucking is the single largest job category in the US

We should invent something like that, 'radio', thing for computers

There is nothing magical about passing through a vagina to with life should start counting from then.

And if you add in modern abortions to life expectancy then the view also changes.

"Is there any example of something that isn't considered math but describes nature?" - "The apple is red" No math, describes nature.

how can we know that computers process information?

that's not technically, that's arbitrarily

Same with the field of medical/military visualization

It's not: 'citation needed' it's rather: 'research is unreliable and, one paper shows x, the next paper shows not-x'

offcourse not, retailers are very sensitive to matters of ethics like this.

The difference between a bullet made of real particles and one made of math is that the real one can kill you.