Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — CjHuber

CjHuber

HN member
Joined
Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 8:22 AM UTC
HN karma
440
Public activity
183 items

About CjHuber

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48906223

    Every good thing is alike, every slop is sloppy in its own way

  2. comment
    Comment #48905221

    Given that codex itself now ships a proxy that wraps the subscription, it seems unlikely https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/codex-rs/responses...

  3. comment
    Comment #48884169

    > Probably because the general purpose subagents inherit the parent model only if you don't specify which model should be used

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #48849708

    > Instead of requiring developers to script every step or passing every tool response back through the model, Programmatic Tool Calling in the Responses API can filter large amount…

  6. comment
    Comment #48830136

    but 5.5 was also no major version bump

  7. comment
    Comment #48829087

    > fit a lot more work inside the model's context window before you're forced into a slow and lossy compaction step This is something I never understood. Why the reasoning is not in…

  8. comment
    Comment #48828897

    Well, obviously its true as you can see in the silbing comment. But still interesting how experiences differ. I wonder did you ever use codex in more demanding workflows, because t…

  9. comment
    Comment #48827857

    Interesting to hear people like gpt-5.5. For me it feels smart only at one shot prompts, but if you try to build up session context before doing something it feels magnitudes infer…

  10. comment
    Comment #48827307

    > so you now have to wait in line for hours Interesting, I go there pretty regularly and while It is well visited, I not once encountered a queue there

  11. comment
    Comment #48795447

    I agree, adaptive thinking is a pest and without a minimum thinking budget especially Claude for me currently defaults to not think at all even on max effort. Sequential-thinking w…

  12. comment
  13. comment
    Comment #48556410

    I think this is a really good cause but I can't help but wonder about the contrast between the puppy analogy and then increasing the friction of installing it by making it a paid t…

  14. comment
    Comment #48538012

    What about GBrain

  15. comment
    Comment #48525958

    Yeah indeed it's very interesting. And the 60k initial context don't even contain the suggested change yet. For me if I don't do this the current models tend to fixate and local pa…

  16. comment
    Comment #48525395

    I'm always a bit confused when people say things like this. 60k token is often more than the initial context I feed the model with. And I don't think I ever had a productive sessio…

  17. comment
    Comment #48494334

    So isn't that just purely security by obscurity then? Would they not rather have someone publicly break it instead of selling a zero day?

  18. comment
    Comment #48472926

    Technically yes

  19. comment
    Comment #48168322

    I‘m glad you didn’t write value

  20. comment
    Comment #47945060

    Are you… explaining the effects of being acquired to Hashimoto?

  21. comment
    Comment #47884483

    It does have an built in documentation subagent it can invoke but that doesn’t help much if they don’t document their shenanigans

  22. comment
    Comment #47884410

    This is exactly what also confused me. I had the exact same prompt in Claude code as well, and the no option implies you can also keep the whole history. But clicking keep apparent…

  23. comment
    Comment #47881826

    No of course it’s unrealistic for them to hold the cache indefinitely and that’s not the point. You are keeping the session data yourself so you can continue even after cache expir…

  24. comment
    Comment #47880732

    I think it’s crazy that they do this, especially without any notice. I would not have renewed my subscription if I knew that they started doing this. Especially in the analysis par…

  25. comment
    Comment #47673983

    I‘d much rather have it go slooower and check more. Why faster it’s way too fast