Viewing profile — ChrisRackauckas

Are you using Polyester.jl? Large numbers of threads are not optimized with Base threads usage due to GC interactions + the hierarchical threading adds overhead vs "unsafe" thread …

The caveat to mention here is that this is with the standard IO interface. If you use Core.println instead of println you get something substantially smaller. A limitation of v1.12…

No it only uses the same LLVM compiler passes and you enable certain optimizations locally via macros if you want to allow reordering in a given expression.

v1.13 already has a good number of improvements to trim in the cases which are less analyzable, but even then I think the best thing for the package ecosystem is to start to become…

We use it for binary deployments via building simulations into the FMI standard (i.e. building FMUs) https://fmi-standard.org/ . We still need to get libraries updated for getting …

Julia v1.12, the unreleased version which is currently in release candidate stage (and has had a longer RC stage than expected but should be done at least by the end of the year) h…

This has nothing to do with floating point error accumulation or numerical stability in the floating point sense. You can do this with arbitrary sized floating point values and you…

This tool already exists in Python and R. See https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/diffeqr/index.html and https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/diffeqpy . Julia has language bindings…

Interesting to see this here! This example is one of the ones mentioned in the appendix of https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09699 , specifically "4.1.2.4 When AD is algorithmically corre…

B-S is just a (bad) explicit Runge-Kutta method. You can see this formally since if you take any order of the B-S method, you can write out its computation as a Runge-Kutta tableau…

The whole point of the article is that "methods are considered more robust and practical if they have larger stability regions" isn't (or at least shouldn't be) necessarily true :-…

Yeah, that's a separate post https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/29149/what-does-... . I wanted to keep this post as simple as possible. If you could show cases where expli…

I mean this for simple devops tasks, like if you need it to write you a Bash script that will clean out some empty caches or something it will one shot it most of the time. And for…

The part that made it much more feasible is that WASM's "new" GC ended up working nicely with Julia's GC, so WebAssemblyCompiler.jl was able to hook into it. With that, a lot more …

Yeah the WebAssemblyCompiler.jl works on things that are StaticCompiler-able https://tshort.github.io/WebAssemblyCompiler.jl/stable/examp... , plus a little bit more since it suppo…

I'm sure there's lots of slop being generated by this stuff, but at least for my work it's mostly solving the simple issues. Maybe it's the slop of "hey can you find out why my cod…

Notice that the examples I show are very minimal changes. If you prompt it to solve the right problems which involves minimal code, then the diffs are easy to manage. There are lot…

The same $200/month Max plan as anyone else. It just gets rate limited sometimes but who cares, you just go back to the fun part of doing your own coding until it's back.

> I really think there needs to be a different term for professional solution engineering using LLMs (like "prompt engineering" but for coding) to differentiate from casual prototy…

> If you don’t mind the engineering skills atrophy then go ahead and vibe code. But know this. You will lose the skills. I don't see why it's an either or. As explained in the arti…

> More worryingly, something I don't see discussed enough is "review fatigue". It's far more fatiguing reviewing the output of an LLM than writing the code yourself a lot of the ti…