Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ChrisLomont

ChrisLomont

HN member
Joined
Mon, Dec 01, 2014, 2:34 PM UTC
HN karma
1,771
Public activity
1,652 items

About ChrisLomont

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #32954501

    >it's that you can't apply statistics to prove this at all If there are not statistical differences, then there are no performance differences. Cheating by definition should imply …

  2. comment
    Comment #32952364

    >It only takes using an engine move once or twice to completely demolish a much better opponent in a game. That's not true. Pick an engine, set to a few hundred points above your s…

  3. comment
    Comment #32952322

    >You either have evidence or you don't. This quasi economic modeling of chess players is ridiculous Modeling provides the best evidence in all aspects of life (design, science, inv…

  4. comment
    Comment #32952063

    >this really weird brute force statistical analysis Care to explain why you call the method "really weird"? Is there a flaw in the statistics that you can correct? Here's [1] his p…

  5. comment
    Comment #32936870

    You can look at oil prices when the war started and see the jump. There was no such jump at any announcement of Biden. The evidence is clear and easily checked.

  6. comment
    Comment #32919178

    >Pay attention when you get a mortgage. I've done quite a bit of modeling for predictive house pricing and investment questions, so I am very aware of how mortgages, math, and hous…

  7. comment
    Comment #32909373

    The article covers that.

  8. comment
    Comment #32899741

    >ideally it would be designed to not take you more than say, 8 years to pay off Making minimum payments always increases the length. How do you define your pay off? For the record …

  9. comment
    Comment #32899662

    Making the loans shorter will make monthly payments scale up, making mortgages less affordable for people.

  10. comment
    Comment #32899618

    >Allow bankruptcy for college loans. Making loans higher interest to handle increased risk, making it even harder for someone to pay for college.

  11. comment
    Comment #32899596

    Very few people are going to be able to follow in your path, which is why looking at statistical outcomes is a much better way to analyze features of a choice.

  12. comment
    Comment #32899578

    >I live in a country where college is paid by the taxpers, May I ask which country? Whenever I look at education stats for a taxpayer college funded system versus the US, there are…

  13. comment
    Comment #32884046

    Yes, it's easy to get an outcome you like by removing context. But go ahead and do minimal work at all your jobs, then report how well that worked for you. Then we can empirically …

  14. comment
    Comment #32876485

    With minimal effort expect a minimal career. Don't complain when late in life you have minimal success.

  15. comment
    Comment #32856956

    If you even looked at the research, they sample all programs for which there is code to be viewed, and find such bugs. Of course you could show that sampling is an invalid way to g…

  16. comment
    Comment #32856901

    Yes, and you replied "Nice excuse. But just wholly untrue." I just provided thousands of examples where it is true. To offset all that evidence can you provide, say, millions of ex…

  17. comment
    Comment #32848057

    My other post listed several thousand use after free bugs in hundreds of commercial programs, so your "zero times W is zero" claim is not accurate in practice.

  18. comment
    Comment #32842220

    From the literature on bugs, even this specific bug is common far beyond "C and Google code". And, if you really want to restrict to your goalpost moving subset, then go ahead and …

  19. comment
    Comment #32842165

    Often the person leaving has not been that good of a contributor due to wanting to leave, while a replacement is new and likely more inclined to work hard. On a big team, people fi…

  20. comment
    Comment #32842075

    Are you claiming that use-after-free bugs do not scale with codebase size? If so, please provide evidence, because that would be amazing.

  21. comment
    Comment #32835575

    >The mistake is thinking everybody else is in it too Which project of similar size doesn't have bugs? You seem to imply most don't, which is empirically untrue. https://scholar.goo…

  22. comment
    Comment #32835565

    >"Scale of your codebase" is a clever excuse, but it doesn't wash. Bugs scale with the size of the codebase, for every entity on earth.

  23. comment
    Comment #32835495

    >get rid of any engineer and the minimum impact is 3-6 months code and culture familiarisation On a big project, say 100 devs over 3 years, 6 man months is 1/600th of the work, so …

  24. comment
    Comment #32816775

    Deutsch Bank has been hit with $600M for laundering, $7.2B over mortgage assets, $2.5B for interest rate manipulation, among a lot of other fines. These are some pretty astounding …

  25. comment
    Comment #32816705

    >The (vast majority of the) Tornado Cash contracts Thousands of little contracts doesn't absolve a financial institution from a few many-billion dollar illegal transfers, especiall…